首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        

论寅正与《黄帝内经》成书年代
引用本文:孙非,张其成.论寅正与《黄帝内经》成书年代[J].中华医史杂志,2008,38(4):204-206.
作者姓名:孙非  张其成
作者单位:1. 东国皇家医科大学,美国洛杉矶,90020
2. 北京中医药大学基础医学院,北京,100029
摘    要:数十年来,学者多以《黄帝内经》用寅正论断其主体或部分成书于汉武帝太初改历之后。这是中国古代医学史研究中的一个重大失误。利用文献学、历法学、考古学的最新成果,以“二重证据法”可以论证:寅正在先秦已经很普及,并非始于汉武,所以以寅正为断代依据来判断《黄帝内经》成书年代的方法和结论是不可靠的。

关 键 词:寅正  岁首  《黄帝内经》  太初改历

On Yinzheng approach and date of compilation of Huang di nei jing (Yellow Emperor's Inner Classic)
SUN Fei,ZHANG Qi-cheng.On Yinzheng approach and date of compilation of Huang di nei jing (Yellow Emperor's Inner Classic)[J].China Journal of Medical History,2008,38(4):204-206.
Authors:SUN Fei  ZHANG Qi-cheng
Institution:SUN Fei , ZHANG Qi-chcng.(Dongguk-Royal Medical University, Los Angeles, CA 90020, USA)
Abstract:Over decades,many scholars attempted to prove that the main body or part of the Huang di nei jing(Yellow Emperor's Inner Classic)was mainly or partially written and compiled after calendar re vision in the year of Taichu of Wudi Emperor of the Han dynasty,by using the Yinzheng approach,i.e. taking the month Yin as the first month of a year.This is one of the serious mistakes in the study of ancient Chinese medical history.By taking the advantage of the newest findings of bibliography,calendar law,and archeology based Oil the methodology of"twofold evidence",it can be proved that the Yinzheng approach had been prevalent before the Qin dynasty instead of after the Wudi Emperor of the Han dynasty,and that the method and conclusion drawn thereby to determine the date of writing and compilation of Nei jing are un reliable.
Keywords:Yinzheng approach  Beginning of a year  Huang di nei jing(Yellow Emperor's Inner Classic)  Calendar revision in the year of Taichu
本文献已被 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号