介入栓塞术和开颅术治疗脑动脉瘤的疗效对比

目的对比分析介入栓塞术和开颅术治疗脑动脉瘤的疗效.方法将116例脑动脉瘤患者随机均分为两组,开颅组患者应用开颅手术进行治疗,介入组患者应用介入栓塞术进行治疗,对比两组患者疗效.结果介入组经治疗治愈率显著高于开颅组,致残率和死亡率均显著低于开颅组,组间差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05).结论应用介入栓塞术治疗脑动脉瘤疗效较好,致残率和死亡率较低,值得临床推广应用.

Comparative efficacy of interventional embolization surgery and craniotomy surgery

Objective To compare the efficacy of interventional embolization surgery and craniotomy surgery treatment of cerebral aneurysms. Methods 116 cases of cerebral aneurysms patients were randomly and average divided into two groups, the craniotomy group patients were given craniotomy surgery for treatment, the intervention group patients were given interventionai embolization surgery for treatment, the efficacy of two groups patients was compared. Results The cure rate of the intervention group was signilicantly higher than the craniotomy group, morbidity and mortality rates were significantly lower than craniotomy, difference between the two grhups were statistically significant（P 〈0.05）. Conclusion The effect of interventional embolization treatment of cerebral aneurysms is good, morbidity and mortality is lower, worthy of promotion and application in clinical.