首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        

宫腔水囊压迫治疗剖宫产术中出血36例疗效观察
引用本文:黄映红.宫腔水囊压迫治疗剖宫产术中出血36例疗效观察[J].国际医药卫生导报,2009,15(7):24-26.
作者姓名:黄映红
作者单位:东莞市万江医院,523050
摘    要:目的探讨水囊压迫治疗剖宫产术中大出血的临床效果。方法对本院2002年5月-2006年收治的剖宫产术中大出血患者72例常规处理方法无效后,分为宫腔放置压迫水囊(水囊组)和宫腔填塞纱布(纱布组),每组36例,比较两种止血方法的疗效。结果两组均能有效控制出血,但水囊组手术操作时间为(128±27.0)s,宫腔填塞物留置时间为(18±5.5)h,纱布组手术操作时间为(202±37.0)s,宫腔填塞物留置时间为(23±2.5)h,两组比较有显著性差异(P〈0.01)。结论压迫水囊治疗剖宫产术中大出血效果较好,操作简便,留置时间短,可在各级医院推广使用。

关 键 词:剖宫产术  产后出血  水囊压迫  治疗

Clinical Observation of intrauterine cystic oppression against massive hemorrhage in cesarean section
HUANG Yin-hong.Clinical Observation of intrauterine cystic oppression against massive hemorrhage in cesarean section[J].International Medicine & Health Guidance News,2009,15(7):24-26.
Authors:HUANG Yin-hong
Institution:HUANC Yin-hong( Wanjiang hospital of Dongguan, Dongguan 523050,China)
Abstract:Objective To explore the clinical effects of the cystic oppression against massive hemorrhage during cesarean section. Method 72 patients with massive hemorrhage in cesarean section were divided into two groups after convention treatment invalid. Experimental group (n =36) were used cystic oppression, and control group (n =36) were used gauze in uterus. The effects were contrast, Results The two groups were able to effectively control the bleeding. The operation time (128±27.0) s and intrauterine stuffing retention time (18 ± 5.5) h in experimental group were less than control group (202 ± 37.0) see. and (23 ± 2.5) h respectively. Difference between the two groups was statistically significant differences (P< 0.01). Conclusion The treatment of intrauterine cystic oppression against massive hemorrhage in cesarean section is effective, simple, and the retention time shortens.
Keywords:Cesarean section  Postpartum hemorrhage  Cystic oppression  Treatment
本文献已被 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号