首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


Circulating immunogenic cell death biomarkers HMGB1 and RAGE in breast cancer patients during neoadjuvant chemotherapy
Authors:Oliver J. Stoetzer  Debora M. I. Fersching  Christoph Salat  Oliver Steinkohl  Christian J Gabka  Ulrich Hamann  Michael Braun  Axel-Mario Feller  Volker Heinemann  Barbara Siegele  Dorothea Nagel  Stefan Holdenrieder
Affiliation:1. Haematology and Oncology Outpatient Cancer Care Center, Franz-Schrank-Str. 2, 80638, Munich, Germany
2. Institute of Clinical Chemistry, University Hospital Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81366, Munich, Germany
3. Breast Cancer Center Klinikum Dritter Orden, Menzinger Str. 44, 80638, Munich, Germany
4. Red Cross Breast Cancer Center II, Taxisstr. 3, 80637, Munich, Germany
5. Breast Cancer Center Dr. Geisenhofer, Hirschauer Str. 6, 80538, Munich, Germany
6. Medical Clinic III, University Hospital Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81366, Munich, Germany
7. Institute of Clinical Chemistry and Clinical Pharmacology, University Hospital Bonn, Sigmund-Freud Str. 25, 53105, Bonn, Germany
Abstract:Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer patients aims at preoperative reduction of tumor volume for better resection results and prognosis. As not all patients respond to neoadjuvant therapy, predictive biomarkers are needed for more efficient individual management. In prospectively collected sera of 51 consecutive locally confined breast cancer (LBC) patients receiving preoperative, neoadjuvant chemotherapy, value level kinetics of soluble high mobility group box 1 (HMGB1), soluble receptor for advanced glycation end products (sRAGE) as well as the established breast cancer biomarkers CA 15–3 and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) were investigated and correlated with therapy response objectified by pathological staging at surgery. In addition, biomarkers were measured in sera of 30 healthy controls (HC), 13 patients with benign breast diseases, and 28 metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients. Pretherapeutic levels of soluble HMGB1 were decreased in MBC, while sRAGE was already decreased in LBC. In contrast, CA 15–3 and CEA were strongly elevated in MBC, but not in LBC. Combination of sRAGE and CA 15–3 enabled best discrimination of LBC from HC (AUC 78.2 %; sens 58 % at 95 % spec), while CA15-3 and CEA discriminated best between MBC and all controls (AUC 90.9 %; sens 70 % at 95 % spec). In LBC patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy, nine patients achieved complete remission (CR), 29 achieved partial remission (PR), while 13 had no change of disease (NC). NC patients tended to have higher HMGB1 and lower sRAGE levels before therapy onset (p?=?0.056 and p?=?0.054), while CA 15–3 and CEA did not predict therapeutic outcome. Furthermore, kinetics of HMGB1 during therapy correlated with efficacy of the treatment (p?=?0.053). Markers of immunogenic cell death are valuable for the diagnosis of MBC and early estimation of response to neoadjuvant therapy in LBC patients.
Keywords:
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号