首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


Establishing diagnostic reference levels for interventional procedures in Kenya
Affiliation:1. Department of Physics and Applied Physics, University of Massachusetts Lowell, One University Avenue, Lowell, MA 01854, USA;2. Radiology Department, Kenyatta National Hospital, Hospital Road, P.O. Box 20723-00202, Nairobi, Kenya;3. Department of Pediatrics and Child Health, University of Nairobi, PO Box 19676-00202, Nairobi, Kenya;4. National Nuclear Regulator, Eco Glades 2 Office Park, Block G, Eco Park, Centurion 0157, South Africa;1. Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts;2. Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts;3. Department of Quality and Safety, American College of Radiology, Reston, Virginia;4. Harvard School of Public Health, Cambridge, Massachusetts;5. Scott and White Department of Radiology, Texas A&M College of Medicine, Temple, Texas;1. Diagnostic Imaging, School of Medicine and Medical Science, University College Dublin, Ireland;2. UCD Obstetrics and Gynaecology, School of Medicine and Medical Science, University College Dublin, National Maternity Hospital, Dublin, Ireland;1. The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, McGovern Medical School, Houston, TX;2. University of Guadalajara, Instituto de Investigación en Reumatología y del Sistema Músculo Esquelético, Guadalajara, Mexico
Abstract:PurposeTo quantify ionizing radiation exposure to patients during interventional procedures and establish national diagnostic reference levels (NDRLs) for clinical radiation exposure management.MethodsThe cumulative reference point air kerma, kerma area product, fluoroscopy time and other operational parameters were monitored for 50 children and 261 adult patient procedures in five catheterization medical laboratories in Kenya. To estimate the risk associated with the exposure, effective doses were derived from the kerma area product using conversion factors from Monte Carlo models.ResultsAbout 3% of the measured cumulative reference point air kerma for the interventional procedures approached the threshold dose limit with the potential to cause deterministic effects such as skin injuries. In interventional cardiology, the results obtained for both children and adults indicated 33% were below the diagnostic reference levels (DRLs). In adult interventional radiology, 29% for cumulative reference point air kerma, and 43% for kerma area product and fluoroscopy time respectively were below the diagnostic reference levels. NDRLs were proposed for routine use in the procedures considered and for the non-existent DRLs situations in paediatric interventional cardiology.ConclusionThe measured patient doses were above the DRLs available in the literature indicating a need for radiation optimization through, continuous monitoring and recording of patient dose. To promote radiation safety, facilities performing interventional procedures need to establish a radiation monitoring notification threshold for possible deterministic effects, in addition to the use of the newly established national diagnostic reference levels, as a quality assurance measure.
Keywords:Radiation exposure  Diagnostic reference levels  Patient dosimetry  Interventional procedures
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号