Chronic viral hepatitis B and C: an argument against the conventional classification of chronic hepatitis

The classification of chronic hepatitis distinguishing benign chronic persistent hepatitis from severe chronic active hepatitis was constructed without knowledge of well-defined aetiological factors. Better understanding of the different hepatitis-viruses has shed new light on this subject. Chronic viral hepatitis B and C each show typical histological patterns. The validity of the conventional classification has been evaluated by a comparative study of chronic viral hepatitis B and C. 130 biopsies from 110 patients with chronic hepatitis C (CH-C) proven serologically by antibodies (second generation testing) were compared with 105 biopsies from 73 patients with chronic hepatitis B (CH-B). These were scored semi-quantatively. In CH-C, lymphoid follicles and/or aggregates were found in 88.5%, fatty degeneration in 51%, bile duct lesions in 46.2%, and Mallory body-like material in the hepatocytes in 9.2%. The portal lymphocytic infiltration generally predominated over the necro-inflammatory lesions of the parenchyma. Chronic persistent hepatitis (defined by the presence of portal hepatitis) was present exclusively in CH-C. Chronic lobular hepatitis was found exclusively in CH-B. We conclude that the histological criteria described for CH-C are highly suggestive of the diagnosis, that the artificial subdivision of chronic hepatitis into CPH and CAH is obsolete and that the histological assessment of chronic hepatitis should consist of a grading of inflammatory activity (minimal, mild, moderate, severe) and staging of fibrosis (extent of distortion of architecture). The final diagnosis should be based on the demonstration of the aetiological agent.