首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

四种粘固剂条件下两种阶梯形核桩钉固位力的研究
引用本文:张翼,马轩祥. 四种粘固剂条件下两种阶梯形核桩钉固位力的研究[J]. 口腔颌面修复学杂志, 2003, 4(3): 183-185
作者姓名:张翼  马轩祥
作者单位:1. 解放军174医院口腔科,主治医师,福建,361003
2. 第四军医大学口腔医学院修复科,主任医师,教授,陕西,710032
摘    要:目的比较两种阶梯形核桩钉在四种粘固剂条件下与模拟根管的固位力.方法将两种阶梯形核桩钉各制作20个试件,随机分为4组,在四种粘固剂条件下测试其与模拟根管的固位力.结果研制的核桩钉固位力明显高于Optipost核桩钉且存在显著差异(P<0.05).四种粘结剂间的固位力存在显著差异(P<0.05).结论研制的阶梯形核桩钉的固位力优于进口的Optipost阶梯形核桩钉,可在临床推广应用.

关 键 词:粘固剂 阶梯形核桩钉 固位力 冠修复体
文章编号:1009-3761(2003)03-0183-03
修稿时间:2002-08-30

A study of retention between two kinds of cylindrical pyramid post-core with four cements
ZHANG Yi,MA Xuan-xiang.. A study of retention between two kinds of cylindrical pyramid post-core with four cements[J]. Chinese Journal of Prosthodontics, 2003, 4(3): 183-185
Authors:ZHANG Yi  MA Xuan-xiang.
Abstract:Objective: To compare the retention in root between two kinds of cylindrical pyramid post-core with fourcements. Methods: A total of 20 specimens of developed post-core and 20 specimens of Optipost post-core were prepared,which were randomly divided into four groups, their tensile strengthes with four cements in simulated root were tested.Results: The developed post-core got higher retention than the Optipost post-core (P<0.05). Retentions among four cementshad significant difference (P<0.05). Conclusion: The retention of the developed post-core was better than the Optipostpost-core in root .The developed cylindrical pyramid post-core has satisfactory effect in clinical application.
Keywords:post-core  retention  cement
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号