首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        


Randomized Trial of Empagliflozin in Nondiabetic Patients With Heart Failure and Reduced Ejection Fraction
Authors:Carlos G Santos-Gallego  Ariana P Vargas-Delgado  Juan Antonio Requena-Ibanez  Alvaro Garcia-Ropero  Donna Mancini  Sean Pinney  Frank Macaluso  Samantha Sartori  Merce Roque  Fernando Sabatel-Perez  Anderly Rodriguez-Cordero  M Urooj Zafar  Icilma Fergus  Farah Atallah-Lajam  Johanna P Contreras  Cathleen Varley  Pedro R Moreno  Vivian M Abascal  Juan J Badimon
Institution:1. Cardiology Department, Cardiovascular Institute, Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, New York, USA;2. AtheroThrombosis Research Unit, Cardiovascular Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA;3. Division of Endocrinology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA;4. Centro Nacional de Investigaciones Cardiovasculares Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
Abstract:BackgroundLarge clinical trials established the benefits of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors in patients with diabetes and with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). The early and significant improvement in clinical outcomes is likely explained by effects beyond a reduction in hyperglycemia.ObjectivesThe purpose of this study was to assess the effect of empagliflozin on left ventricular (LV) function and volumes, functional capacity, and quality of life (QoL) in nondiabetic HFrEF patients.MethodsIn this double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, nondiabetic HFrEF patients (n = 84) were randomized to empagliflozin 10 mg daily or placebo for 6 months. The primary endpoint was change in LV end-diastolic and -systolic volume assessed by cardiac magnetic resonance. Secondary endpoints included changes in LV mass, LV ejection fraction, peak oxygen consumption in the cardiopulmonary exercise test, 6-min walk test, and quality of life.ResultsEmpagliflozin was associated with a significant reduction of LV end-diastolic volume (?25.1 ± 26.0 ml vs. ?1.5 ± 25.4 ml for empagliflozin vs. placebo, respectively; p < 0.001) and LV end-systolic volume (?26.6 ± 20.5 ml vs. ?0.5 ± 21.9 ml for empagliflozin vs. placebo; p < 0.001). Empagliflozin was associated with reductions in LV mass (?17.8 ± 31.9 g vs. 4.1 ± 13.4 g, for empagliflozin vs. placebo, respectively; p < 0.001) and LV sphericity, and improvements in LV ejection fraction (6.0 ± 4.2 vs. ?0.1 ± 3.9; p < 0.001). Patients who received empagliflozin had significant improvements in peak O2 consumption (1.1 ± 2.6 ml/min/kg vs. ?0.5 ± 1.9 ml/min/kg for empagliflozin vs. placebo, respectively; p = 0.017), oxygen uptake efficiency slope (111 ± 267 vs. ?145 ± 318; p < 0.001), as well as in 6-min walk test (81 ± 64 m vs. ?35 ± 68 m; p < 0.001) and quality of life (Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire-12: 21 ± 18 vs. 2 ± 15; p < 0.001).ConclusionsEmpagliflozin administration to nondiabetic HFrEF patients significantly improves LV volumes, LV mass, LV systolic function, functional capacity, and quality of life when compared with placebo. Our observations strongly support a role for sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors in the treatment of HFrEF patients independently of their glycemic status. (Are the “Cardiac Benefits” of Empagliflozin Independent of Its Hypoglycemic Activity? ATRU-4] EMPA-TROPISM]; NCT03485222)
Keywords:cardiac magnetic resonance  clinical trial  heart failure  LV remodeling  SGLT2-inhibitors  6MWT"}  {"#name":"keyword"  "$":{"id":"kwrd0040"}  "$$":[{"#name":"text"  "_":"6-min walk test  CMR"}  {"#name":"keyword"  "$":{"id":"kwrd0050"}  "$$":[{"#name":"text"  "_":"cardiac magnetic resonance  CPET"}  {"#name":"keyword"  "$":{"id":"kwrd0060"}  "$$":[{"#name":"text"  "_":"cardiopulmonary exercise test  HFrEF"}  {"#name":"keyword"  "$":{"id":"kwrd0070"}  "$$":[{"#name":"text"  "_":"heart failure with reduced ejection fraction  KCCQ-12"}  {"#name":"keyword"  "$":{"id":"kwrd0080"}  "$$":[{"#name":"text"  "_":"Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire  LV"}  {"#name":"keyword"  "$":{"id":"kwrd0090"}  "$$":[{"#name":"text"  "_":"left ventricle/ventricular  LVEDV"}  {"#name":"keyword"  "$":{"id":"kwrd0100"}  "$$":[{"#name":"text"  "_":"left ventricular end-diastolic volume  LVEF"}  {"#name":"keyword"  "$":{"id":"kwrd0110"}  "$$":[{"#name":"text"  "_":"left ventricle ejection fraction  LVESV"}  {"#name":"keyword"  "$":{"id":"kwrd0120"}  "$$":[{"#name":"text"  "_":"left ventricular end-systolic volume  OUES"}  {"#name":"keyword"  "$":{"id":"kwrd0130"}  "$$":[{"#name":"text"  "_":"oxygen uptake efficiency slope  SGLT2i"}  {"#name":"keyword"  "$":{"id":"kwrd0140"}  "$$":[{"#name":"text"  "_":"sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors  oxygen consumption
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号