Influences on Immunization Decision-Making among US Parents of Young Children |
| |
Authors: | Yunmi Chung,Jay Schamel,Allison Fisher,Paula M. Frew |
| |
Affiliation: | 1.Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine,Emory University School of Medicine,Atlanta,USA;2.Oak Ridge Institue for Science and Education (ORISE),Oak Ridge,USA;3.National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention,Atlanta,USA;4.Department of Behavioral Sciences and Health Education, Rollins School of Public Health,Emory University,Atlanta,USA;5.Hubert Department of Global Health, Rollins School of Public Health,Emory University,Atlanta,USA;6.Institute of Public and Preventive Health,Augusta University,Augusta,USA |
| |
Abstract: | Objectives This study assessed influences on vaccination decisions among parents of young children and examined common vaccination information and advice sources. Methods Using panel samples of parents of children under 7 years, web-based surveys were conducted in 2012 (n?=?2603) and 2014 (n?=?2518). A vaccine decision-making typology (non-hesitant acceptors, hesitant acceptors, delayers, and refusers) was established and weighted population estimates of potential factors influencing parental vaccination decision (e.g., provider influence, source of information and advice) were computed by year and decision type. Results Delayers and refusers were more likely than acceptors to know someone whose child experienced a severe reaction to a vaccine or delayed/refused vaccine(s). High proportions of delayers (2012: 33.4%, 2014: 33.9%) and refusers (2012: 49.6%, 2014: 58.6%) reported selecting their healthcare provider based on whether the provider would allow them to delay/refuse vaccines. Providers were the most frequently reported trusted vaccine information source among all parents, though more often by acceptors than refusers (2012, 2014: p?0.01). We found differing patterns of provider advice-seeking and internet as a reliable vaccine information source by group. Among those who had considered delay/refusal, trust in their healthcare provider’s advice was the most common reason cited for their decision reversal. Conclusions for Practice Provider trust and communication along with varying degrees of personal-network influences likely contribute to immunization decisions of parents. Vaccine hesitant parents often seek providers amenable to accommodating their vaccine beliefs. Providers may benefit from vaccine communication training as their recommendations may influence hesitant parents to immunize their children. |
| |
Keywords: | |
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录! |
|