压缩雾化吸入对96例小儿支气管哮喘患儿的护理效果研究

目的分析对小儿支气管哮喘患儿实施压缩雾化吸入过程中的护理方法和效果。方法收集我院2012年7月至2013年7月期间经压缩雾化吸入治疗的小儿支气管哮喘患儿96例作为研究对象并随机分为两组各48例。对照组患儿采用常规护理模式,试验组患儿在对照组的基础上加强雾化吸入护理、哮喘护理、体质加强干预,比较两组的临床效果以及治疗前后患儿的肺功能指标(FEV1%,FEV1,FVC,PEFR%)。结果试验组总有效率为95.83%,显著高于对照组的79.17%,组间差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。两组患儿护理前FEV1%、FEV1、FVC、PEFR%比较无明显差异(P>0.05),经治疗后均得到明显改善(P<0.05),且试验组改善水平明显优于对照组(P<0.05)。结论对小儿支气管哮喘患儿实施压缩雾化吸入过程中加强雾化吸入护理、哮喘护理、体质加强干预具有良好的效果,能有效促进肺功能改善,值得在临床上推广。

Study on the Effect of Compression Atomizing Inhalation on 96 Cases of Children with Bronchial Asthma

Objective To analyze the nursing methods during compression atomizing inhalation of children with bronchial asthma and its effects. Methods 96 cases of children with bronchial asthma treated with compression atomizing inhalation in our hospital from April 2012 to April 2013 were selected and randomly divided into the experimental group and the control group, with 48 cases in each group. Children in the control group were given routine nursing mode, while children in the experimental group were given inhalation care, asthma care and physical strengthening intervention on the basis of routine nursing. The clinical effects and children＆#39;s lung function indexes （FEV1%, FEV1, FVC, PEFR%） before and after nursing were compared between two groups. Results The total effective rate of experimental group was 95.83%, significantly higher than 79.17%of control group （P〈0.05）. There were no statistical differences between two groups in the FEV1%, FEV1, FVC and PEFR%before nursing;The FEV1%, FEV1, FVC and PEFR%of both group improved significantly after nursing, and the improvement degrees of experimental group were significantly better than those of control group （P〈0.05）. Conclusions For children with bronchial asthma, inhalation care, asthma care and physical strengthening intervention during compression atomizing inhalation have significant effect. It can promote the improvement of lung function, which is worthy of clinical promotion.