首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        


Time to recovery in patients with acute painful musculoskeletal conditions treated with extended-release or immediate-release cyclobenzaprine
Authors:Stephen Landy  Charles A Altman  Fang Xie
Institution:(1) Medical Affairs and Clinical Research, Ipca Laboratories Ltd., 142 AB, Kandivli Industrial Estate, Kandivli (West), Mumbai, 400067, India;(2) Clinical Research and Development, Ipca Laboratories Ltd., Plot no. 48, International House, Kandivli Industrial Estate, Mumbai, 400067, India;(3) Department of Orthopaedics, J. J. Hospital, K C Marg, Byculla, Mumbai, 400008, India;(4) Department of Orthopaedics, Indira Gandhi Government Medical College, C. A. Road, Nagpur 18, India;(5) Department of Orthopaedics, Mahatma Gandhi Medical College and Hospital, Sitapura, Jaipur, 302 022, India;(6) Department of Orthopaedics, B. J. Medical College and Sassoon Hospital, Pune, 411001, India
Abstract:

Introduction

This post-hoc analysis examined time to recovery in patients with acute, painful musculoskeletal conditions following cyclobenzaprine extended release (CER; AMRIX® Cephalon, Inc., Frazer, PA, USA), cyclobenzaprine immediate release (CIR; Flexeril® Pliva, Pomona, NY, USA), or placebo administration.

Methods

Data were pooled from two identically designed, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallelgroup studies. Adults with acute, painful local muscle spasm were randomized to once-daily CER 15 mg, once-daily CER 30 mg, three-timesdaily CIR 10 mg, or placebo for 14 days. Efficacy assessments were time to first rating of “a lot” or “complete” relief from local pain or restriction of movement and patient-rated medication helpfulness.

Results

A total of 504 patients were randomized, and 330 (65.5%) completed the studies. Median times to “a lot” or “complete” relief from local pain were faster with CER 15 mg (6 days, P=0.016), CER 30 mg (5 days, P=0.002), and CIR (5 days, P=0.002) versus placebo (8 days). Time to “a lot” or “complete” relief from restriction of movement was faster with CER 30 mg (5 days, P=0.004) and CIR (5 days, P=0.009) versus placebo (7 days). Median times to “very good” or “excellent” medication helpfulness were 10 days (CER 15 mg, P=0.020), 8 days (CER 30 mg, P=0.004), and 7 days (CIR, P<0.001) versus >14 days (placebo). Dry mouth, constipation, dizziness, headache, and somnolence were the most commonly reported adverse events. Somnolence rates were lower with CER 15 mg (0.8%, P=0.008) and CER 30 mg (1.6%, P=0.028) versus CIR (7.3%).

Conclusion

Relief from local pain and restriction of movement occurred sooner with CER and CIR than placebo. CER was associated with less somnolence than CIR.
Keywords:
本文献已被 PubMed SpringerLink 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号