首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        


A multidisciplinary consensus on dehydration: definitions,diagnostic methods and clinical implications
Authors:Jonathan Lacey  Jo Corbett  Lui Forni  Lee Hooper  Fintan Hughes  Gary Minto
Institution:1. Institute of Sport Exercise &2. Health, University College London, London, UK;3. Department of Sport &4. Exercise Science, University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth, UK;5. Intensive Care Unit, Royal Surrey County Hospital, Guildford, UK;6. Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK;7. Department of Anaesthesia, University Hospitals Plymouth, Plymouth, UK;8. Peninsula School of Medicine, Plymouth, UK
Abstract:Background: Dehydration appears prevalent, costly and associated with adverse outcomes. We sought to generate consensus on such key issues and elucidate need for further scientific enquiry.

Materials and methods: A modified Delphi process combined expert opinion and evidence appraisal. Twelve relevant experts addressed dehydration’s definition, objective markers and impact on physiology and outcome.

Results: Fifteen consensus statements and seven research recommendations were generated. Key findings, evidenced in detail, were that there is no universally accepted definition for dehydration; hydration assessment is complex and requires combining physiological and laboratory variables; “dehydration” and “hypovolaemia” are incorrectly used interchangeably; abnormal hydration status includes relative and/or absolute abnormalities in body water and serum/plasma osmolality (pOsm); raised pOsm usually indicates dehydration; direct measurement of pOsm is the gold standard for determining dehydration; pOsm >300 and ≤280 mOsm/kg classifies a person as hyper or hypo-osmolar; outside extremes, signs of adult dehydration are subtle and unreliable; dehydration is common in hospitals and care homes and associated with poorer outcomes.

Discussion: Dehydration poses risk to public health. Dehydration is under-recognized and poorly managed in hospital and community-based care. Further research is required to improve assessment and management of dehydration and the authors have made recommendations to focus academic endeavours.

  • Key messages
  • Dehydration assessment is a major clinical challenge due to a complex, varying pathophysiology, non-specific clinical presentations and the lack of international consensus on definition and diagnosis.

  • Plasma osmolality represents a valuable, objective surrogate marker of hypertonic dehydration which is underutilized in clinical practice.

  • Dehydration is prevalent within the healthcare setting and in the community, and appears associated with increased morbidity and mortality.

Keywords:Dehydration  osmolar concentration  body fluid compartments  consensus  body water  water–electrolyte balance
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号