Cost reduction using ultrasound in blunt abdominal trauma |
| |
Authors: | Kimberley Lentz McKenney M.D. Mark G. McKenney M.D. Diego B. Nuñez M.D. Larry Martin M.D. |
| |
Affiliation: | (1) Department of Trauma Radiology and Trauma Surgery, University of Miami School of Medicine/Jackson Memorial Hospital/Ryder Trauma Center, Miami, Florida;(2) Department of Radiology (R-109), University of Miami School of Medicine, P.O. Box 016960, 33101 Miami, FI |
| |
Abstract: | Ultrasound (US) provides a rapid, portable, and noninvasive method for evaluating the blunt trauma patient. In 1993, US was introduced into the workup of blunt abdominal trauma (BAT) at our institution and has rapidly become the modality of choice over computed tomography (CT) and diagnostic peritoneal lavage (DPL). In this study, the cost effectiveness of utilizing US in BAT was evaluated.We compared the number of DPLs and CTs performed during the 6-month period in 1993 preceding the incorporation of US with the number of CTs, DPLs, and USs performed during the last 6 months of 1994. Costs were determined by the finance department based on actual expenditures by the hospital, excluding physician fees, in 1994 U.S. dollars.Six hundred twenty-six patients were evaluated for BAT during the 6-month period in 1993. In this group, 450 patients had CT examinations, 160 had DPL, and 16 had both. This resulted in a cost of $254,316. During the last 6 months in 1994,564 patients were evaluated for BAT, including 470 USs, 175 CTs, and 11 DPLs. The cost for this group was $133,077, with a decrease in hospital expenditure of $170 per patient.We conclude that utilizing US in the evaluation of BAt leads to a significant cost reduction. Extrapolated over 1 year, with 1100 blunt abdominal trauma patients, the cost savings would be over $187,000. |
| |
Keywords: | Ultrasonography, abdominal trauma Cost, trauma Ultrasonography |
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录! |
|