| 4种抗高血压药物治疗方案的成本-效果分析 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 黄际薇,李瑞珍,刘杰,麦海燕. 4种抗高血压药物治疗方案的成本-效果分析[J]. 中国药房, 2005, 16(20): 1553-1555 |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 黄际薇 李瑞珍 刘杰 麦海燕 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 中山大学附属第三医院药剂科,广州市,510630 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 目的:评价4种抗高血压药物治疗方案的成本-效果。方法:将212例高血压患者随机分为4组,A组给予氨氯地平,B组给予福辛普利,C组给予坎地沙坦酯,D组给予氯沙坦钾,观察各组疗效,并进行成本-效果分析。结果:C组疗效显著高于A、B、D组(P<0·05),且C组成本-效果比为4组中最低。结论:坎地沙坦酯(C组)方案治疗高血压较佳。
|
| 关 键 词： | 高血压 治疗方案 成本-效果分析 |
| 文章编号： | 1001-0408（2005）20-1553-03 |
| 收稿时间： | 2005-06-17 |
| 修稿时间： | 2005-09-08 |
Cost- Effectivness Analysis on 4 Treatment Regimens for Hypertension |
| |
| HUANG Jiwei,LI Ruizhen,LIU Jie,MAI Haiyan. Cost- Effectivness Analysis on 4 Treatment Regimens for Hypertension[J]. China Pharmacy, 2005, 16(20): 1553-1555 |
| |
| Authors: | HUANG Jiwei LI Ruizhen LIU Jie MAI Haiyan |
| |
| Affiliation: | Dept, of Pharmacy, The Third Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat - sen University, Guangzhou 510630, China |
| |
| Abstract: | OBJECTIVE:To compare the costs and effectiveness of4treatment regimens for hypertension.METHODS:212cases of hypertension were randomly divided into4groups,group A treated with amlodipine,group B treated with fosinoˉpril,group C treated with candesartan cilexetil,and group D treated with losartan;the curative effects in each group were obˉserved and cost-effectiveness analyses were made.RESULTS:The effective rate in group C was markedly higher than those in other3groups(P<0.05),and the cost-effectiveness ratio in group C was the lowest.CONCLUSION:The regimen of can_ desartan cilexetil(group C)is the preferable one for hypertension. |
| |
| Keywords: | Hypertension Treatment regimen Cost-effectiveness analysis |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
