A comparative study of clinical and paramedical aspects of multiple sclerosis in Tunisia

INTRODUCTION: Tunisia is considered as a low zone of prevalence for multiple sclerosis (MS). Consequently, only very few studies have taken an interest in this disorder in North Africa. The objective of this study was to compare the clinical and paraclinical parameters and the outcome of the disease in patients affected with MS in Tunisia during two periods (1974-1978 and 1996-2000) and to determine the incidence of the disease and the impact of the use of diagnostic criteria, including the MRI. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We report the results of a retrospective study concerning patients classified with MS and followed in the National Institute of Neurology in Tunis between 1974 and 2000, with 1058 records examined. We divided the patients into two groups belonging to two periods: Group I (1974-1978, 125 patients classified according to the McAlpine criteria) and Group II (1996-2000, 247 patients classified according to Poser's criteria. We compared the clinical and paraclinical parameters of the two groups. RESULTS: The incidence of the disease was evaluated at 1.3 per 100,000 individuals, placing Tunisia in the middle zone of prevalence. There was no significant difference in the mean age of onset (32.4+/-10.1 years) between the two groups. A slight male preponderance was observed in Group I (M/F sex ratio=1.25). The clinical outcome factors were age of onset after 40 years, pyramidal signs as the first symptom, and the progressive forms of the disease. Although Group II had an earlier diagnosis of the disease and a more systematic treatment of relapses, the functional outcome was similar between the two groups. CONCLUSION: MS in Tunisia has the same clinical characteristics and disease outcome as in other countries. The use of MRI allowed earlier diagnosis but did not increase the overall proportion of definite MS.