首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        

两种便血检测方法比较
引用本文:蒋辉.两种便血检测方法比较[J].检验医学与临床,2011,8(21):2589-2590,2592.
作者姓名:蒋辉
作者单位:湖北省襄阳市妇幼保健院,441003
摘    要:目的评价转铁蛋白/血红蛋白双联便隐血检测方法的临床应用价值。方法比较联合免疫法与化学法检测198例临床疾病患者大便隐血的阳性检出率,其中包括76例阴性病例、78例上消化道出血病例和44例下消化道出血病例。结果化学法对人和动物的血红蛋白均发生反应,常出现假阳性;联合免疫法只对人的血红蛋白、转铁蛋白发生抗原抗体反应,从而进一步提高了阳性检出率。对于76例阴性病例、78例上消化道出血和44例下消化道出血病例,化学法检出阳性74、44、22例,联合免疫法检出阳性76、76、42例。结论联合免疫法灵敏度高,同时测定血红蛋白和转铁蛋白可提高消化道出血及大肠肿瘤检出率。

关 键 词:大便隐血  化学法  联合免疫法

The comparison of hemafecia test methods
JIANG Hui.The comparison of hemafecia test methods[J].Laboratory Medicine and Clinic,2011,8(21):2589-2590,2592.
Authors:JIANG Hui
Institution:JIANG Hui(Maternal and Child Health Hospital of Xiangyang City,Hubei 441003,China)
Abstract:Objective To evaluate the clinical value of the transferrin / hemoglobin double-hemafecia test method.Methods The positive rates of 198 clinical hemafecia cases tested by union immunity and chemical method respectively were compared.There were 76 of negative cases,78 of upper gastrointestinal bleeding cases,and 44 of gastrointestinal bleeding cases.Results The chemical method often showed false positive in testing both human and animal hemoglobin react,The union immunity method only showed antigen-antibody ...
Keywords:hemafecia  chemical method  union immunity  
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号