首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

医院感染病例漏报的前瞻性监测与控制
引用本文:王惠,吕宇,向钱,蔡敏泓,魏道琼,吴佳玉,周忠华,王晨,刘华. 医院感染病例漏报的前瞻性监测与控制[J]. 中国感染控制杂志, 2018, 17(11): 1022-1025. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-9638.2018.11.016
作者姓名:王惠  吕宇  向钱  蔡敏泓  魏道琼  吴佳玉  周忠华  王晨  刘华
作者单位:医院感染病例漏报的前瞻性监测与控制
摘    要:目的探索医院感染病例前瞻性监测与漏报控制方法,分析其实施效果,为有针对性地制定医院感染病例漏报监控策略提供依据。方法 2016年1月—2017年6月运用品管圈(QCC)方法,前瞻性监测住院患者中的医院感染病例,对医院感染漏报进行控制。结果建成"信息化系统智能筛查+移动通讯短信提醒+院感督导"三位一体的前瞻式医院感染病例堵漏监控模式,第一轮PDCA循环后医院感染漏报率由QCC活动前的79.16%降至59.75%,差异有统计学意义(χ~2=208.821,P=0.000);与第一轮PDCA循环后的医院感染漏报率相比,第二轮PDCA循环后医院感染漏报率降至26.18%,差异有统计学意义(χ~2=200.075,P=0.002)。结论在医院感染病例漏报发生前,采取积极前瞻性的防控,可有效避免医院感染病例漏报。

关 键 词:医院感染  管理  漏报  品管圈  
收稿时间:2017-12-22
修稿时间:2018-02-20

Prospective monitoring and control for missing reporting of healthcare associated infection cases
WANG Hui,LV Yu,XIANG Qian,CAI Min hong,WEI Dao qiong,WU Jia yu,ZHOU Zhong hu,WANG Chen,LIU Hua. Prospective monitoring and control for missing reporting of healthcare associated infection cases[J]. Chinese Journal of Infection Control, 2018, 17(11): 1022-1025. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-9638.2018.11.016
Authors:WANG Hui  LV Yu  XIANG Qian  CAI Min hong  WEI Dao qiong  WU Jia yu  ZHOU Zhong hu  WANG Chen  LIU Hua
Affiliation:Sichuan Academy of Medical Sciences & Sichuan Provincial People’s Hospital, Chengdu 610072, China
Abstract:ObjectiveTo explore the prospective monitoring and control methods for missing reporting of healthcare associated infection(HAI) cases, analyze its implementation efficacy, provide basis for formulating targeted strategy for monitoring missing report of HAI.MethodsFrom January 2016 to June 2017, the quality control circle(QCC) method was used to prospectively monitor HAI cases in hospitalized patients, missing reporting of HAI was controlled.Results“Information system intelligence screening+mobile messaging alerts+ HAI supervision” trinity monitoring model for avoid missing reporting of HAI cases was established, after the first round of PDCA(plan, do, check, action) cycle, missing reporting rate of HAI decreased from 79.16% before QCC to 59.75% after QCC, difference was statistically significant (χ2=208.821, P=0.000). Compared with missing reporting rate of HAI after the first round of PDCA, missing reporting rate of HAI after the second round of PDCA dropped to 26.18%, difference was statistically significant (χ2=200.075, P=0.002).ConclusionActive prospective prevention and control before missing reporting of HAI can effectively avoid missing reporting of HAI cases.
Keywords:healthcare associated infection  management  missing reporting  quality control circle
本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《中国感染控制杂志》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《中国感染控制杂志》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号