首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        


Attributable risk in men in two French case-control studies on mesothelioma and asbestos
Authors:Aude Lacourt  Patrick Rolland  Céline Gramond  Philippe Astoul  Soizick Chamming’s  Stéphane Ducamp  Catherine Frenay  Françoise Galateau-Sallé  Anabelle Gilg Soit Ilg  Ellen Imbernon  Nolwenn Le Stang  Jean Claude Pairon  Marcel Goldberg  Yuriko Iwatsubo  Louis-Rachid Salmi  Patrick Brochard
Institution:1. Laboratoire Santé Travail Environnement, EA 3672, Institut de Santé Publique, d’épidémiologie et de Développement, Université Victor Segalen Bordeaux 2, 33076, Bordeaux, France
2. équipe Associée en Santé Travail - Essat (InVS/DST - LSTE/EA3672), 33076, Bordeaux, France
7. Département Santé Travail, Institut de Veille Sanitaire, 94415, Saint Maurice, France
3. Service d’Oncologie Thoracique, Département des Maladies Respiratoires, H?pital Sainte Marguerite, 13009, Marseille, France
4. Institut Interuniversitaire de Médecine du Travail de Paris Ile de France, 75270, Paris, France
6. Registre Multicentrique à Vocation Nationale des Mésothéliomes Pleuraux (MESONAT), 14033, Caen, France
5. Service d’Anatomie Pathologique, H?pital de la Cote de Nacre, 14033, Caen, France
8. INSERM, U955, 94010, Créteil, France
9. Faculté de Médecine, Université Paris-Est Créteil-Val de Marne, 94010, Créteil, France
10. Centre de recherche INSERM U897 ‘épidémiologie et Biostatistique’, Université Victor Segalen Bordeaux 2, 33076, Bordeaux, France
Abstract:Pleural mesothelioma is a primary tumor of the pleura that is mainly due to asbestos exposure. To study the relationship between mesothelioma and occupational asbestos exposure in France, two case–control studies (A and B) were conducted. A substantial difference in the attributable risk in the population (ARp) was observed among men: 44.5% (95% CI: 32.6–56.4]) in study A and 83.2% (95% CI: 76.8–89.6]) in study B. As different exposure assessment expert methods were used, the main objective of this work was to re-estimate the ARp men in two case–control studies according to a common standardized exposure assessment by using a Job Exposure Matrix (JEM) and to assess the role of subjects’ selection. The initial observed ARp difference was maintained: 36.3% (95% CI: 24.3–50.3]) in study A and 69.7% (95% CI: 51.7–83.2]) in study B. Further investigations highlighted the potential selection bias introduced in both studies, especially among controls. The ARp could be underestimated in study A and overestimated in study B. After weighting subjects according to distribution of socio-economic status in the general population for controls and according to distribution of socio-economic status of cases registered by the French National Mesothelioma Surveillance Program, re-estimated ARp values were 52.4% in study A and 70.2% in study B. These results provide additional information to describe the relationship between pleural mesothelioma and occupational asbestos exposure, but also confirm the importance of subjects’ recruitment in case control studies, particularly control selection.
Keywords:
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号