首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

不同类型冠心病介入治疗安全性比较分析
引用本文:谢睿彬,彭育欢,张小新,林东,廖佩娟,林云,谭泰康. 不同类型冠心病介入治疗安全性比较分析[J]. 中国医药导报, 2012, 9(26): 34-35
作者姓名:谢睿彬  彭育欢  张小新  林东  廖佩娟  林云  谭泰康
作者单位:广西壮族自治区贺州市人民医院心内科
基金项目:广西壮族自治区贺州市科学研究与技术开发计划项目(项目编号:贺科能070710Y)
摘    要:目的探讨不同类型冠心病行冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的安全性。方法回顾性分析148例冠心病患者,其中慢性冠脉病组44例,急性冠脉综合征组104例,均行择期PCI治疗,对比两组患者的手术相关并发症。结果慢性冠脉病与急性冠脉综合征组术手术相关并发症(急性血栓、无复流/慢血流、再闭塞、死亡等)比较差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05)。结论不同类型冠心病患者行择期介入治疗安全性相近。

关 键 词:冠心病  介入治疗  安全性

Safety analysis and comparison of PCI in different coronary heart diceases
XIE Ruibing,PENG Yuhuan,ZHANG Xiaoxin,LIN Dong,LIAO Peijuan,LIN Yun,TAN Taikang. Safety analysis and comparison of PCI in different coronary heart diceases[J]. China Medical Herald, 2012, 9(26): 34-35
Authors:XIE Ruibing  PENG Yuhuan  ZHANG Xiaoxin  LIN Dong  LIAO Peijuan  LIN Yun  TAN Taikang
Affiliation:Department of Cardiology,the People′s Hospital of Hezhou City,Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region,Hezhou 542800,China
Abstract:Objective To investigate the safety of percutaneous coronary intervention(PCI) treatments in different coronary heart diseases.Methods 148 cases of coronary heart disease were retrospective studied,including 44 cases with chronic coronary syndromes and 104 cases with acute coronary syndromes.All were performed selective PCI treatment.Operative complications were compared.Results No significant difference(P > 0.05) was found in operative complications(acute thrombosis,no-reflow,slow flow,reocclusion and death) between chronic coronary group and acute coronary group.Conclusion There could be similar safety in selective PCI treatment between different coronary heart diceases.
Keywords:Coronary heart decease  PCI  Safety
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号