Comparing United States and Canadian population exposures from National Biomonitoring Surveys: bisphenol A intake as a case study |
| |
Authors: | Lakind Judy S Levesque Johanne Dumas Pierre Bryan Shirley Clarke Janine Naiman Daniel Q |
| |
Affiliation: | LaKind Associates, LLC, Catonsville, MD 21228, USA. lakindassoc@comcast.net |
| |
Abstract: | The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention provides biomonitoring data in the United States as part of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). Recently, Statistics Canada initiated a similar survey - the Canadian Health Measures Survey (CHMS). Comparison of US and Canadian biomonitoring data can generate hypotheses regarding human exposures from environmental media and consumer products. To ensure that such comparisons are scientifically meaningful, it is essential to first evaluate aspects of the surveys' methods that can impact comparability of data. We examined CHMS and NHANES methodologies, using bisphenol A (BPA) as a case study, to evaluate whether survey differences exist that would hinder our ability to compare chemical concentrations between countries. We explored methods associated with participant selection, urine sampling, and analytical methods. BPA intakes were also estimated to address body weight differences between countries. Differences in survey methods were identified but are unlikely to have substantial impacts on inter-survey comparisons of BPA intakes. BPA intakes for both countries are below health-based guidance values set by the US, Canada and the European Food Safety Authority. We recommend that before comparing biomonitoring data between surveys, a thorough review of methodologic aspects that might impact biomonitoring results be conducted. |
| |
Keywords: | |
本文献已被 PubMed 等数据库收录! |
|