The relationship between birth timing,circuit wiring,and physiological response properties of cerebellar granule cells

Cerebellar granule cells (GrCs) are usually regarded as a uniform cell type that collectively expands the coding space of the cerebellum by integrating diverse combinations of mossy fiber inputs. Accordingly, stable molecularly or physiologically defined GrC subtypes within a single cerebellar region have not been reported. The only known cellular property that distinguishes otherwise homogeneous GrCs is the correspondence between GrC birth timing and the depth of the molecular layer to which their axons project. To determine the role birth timing plays in GrC wiring and function, we developed genetic strategies to access early- and late-born GrCs. We initiated retrograde monosynaptic rabies virus tracing from control (birth timing unrestricted), early-born, and late-born GrCs, revealing the different patterns of mossy fiber input to GrCs in vermis lobule 6 and simplex, as well as to early- and late-born GrCs of vermis lobule 6: sensory and motor nuclei provide more input to early-born GrCs, while basal pontine and cerebellar nuclei provide more input to late-born GrCs. In vivo multidepth two-photon Ca²⁺ imaging of axons of early- and late-born GrCs revealed representations of diverse task variables and stimuli by both populations, with modest differences in the proportions encoding movement, reward anticipation, and reward consumption. Our results suggest neither organized parallel processing nor completely random organization of mossy fiber→GrC circuitry but instead a moderate influence of birth timing on GrC wiring and encoding. Our imaging data also provide evidence that GrCs can represent generalized responses to aversive stimuli, in addition to recently described reward representations.

Cerebellar granule cells (GrCs) comprise the majority of neurons in the mammalian brain (1, 2). Each GrC receives only four excitatory inputs from mossy fibers, which originate in a variety of brainstem nuclei and the spinal cord, and the vast number of GrCs permits diverse combinations of mossy fiber inputs. Classical theories of cerebellar function have therefore proposed that GrCs integrate diverse, multimodal mossy fiber inputs and thus collectively expand coding space in the cerebellum (3–5). Until recently, studies have focused on the role of GrCs in implementing sparse coding of sensorimotor variables and stimuli (6–9). However, recent physiological studies of GrCs in awake, behaving animals highlight GrC encoding of cognitive signals in addition to sensorimotor signals (10–13). GrCs have also been recently shown to encode denser representations than expected by classical theory (10–12, 14–18), including a lack of dimensionality expansion under certain conditions (18).Despite the vast number of GrCs, stable molecularly or physiologically defined GrC subtypes within a single cerebellar region or lobule have not been described (19–22), although variation in gene expression across different regions has been reported (22, 23). The only known axis along which spatially intermingled GrCs can be distinguished from each other is the depth of the molecular layer to which their parallel fiber axons (PFs) project, which is dictated by GrC lineage and birth timing (24, 25). Birth timing predicts the wiring and functional properties of diverse neuron types in many neural systems (26), including the neocortex (27, 28), other forebrain regions (29, 30), olfactory bulb (31–33), and ventral spinal cord (34, 35). Furthermore, classic studies utilizing γ-irradiation at different times during rat postnatal development to ablate different cerebellar GrC and interneuron populations suggested that GrCs born at different times could contribute differentially to motor vs. action coordination (36). These observations also led to an as-of-yet untested hypothesis that mossy fibers arriving at different times during development could connect with different GrC populations. Could GrC birth timing be an organizing principle for information processing in the cerebellum?Recent evidence and modeling point to the possibility of spatial clusters of coactivated PFs (15, 37), suggesting that GrCs born around the same time may disproportionally receive coactive mossy fiber inputs. However, another study using different methods and stimuli did not find differences in the physiological responses of early- and late-born GrCs to various sensorimotor stimuli (38). Here, we address the role of birth timing in GrC wiring and function. We developed strategies to gain genetic access to early- and late-born GrCs, as well as control GrCs not restricted by birth timing. We report the first monosynaptic input tracing to GrCs, finding differential mossy fiber inputs to GrCs in vermis lobule 6 and simplex, as well as different patterns of input to early- and late-born GrCs in vermis lobule 6. Finally, we performed in vivo multidepth two-photon Ca²⁺ imaging of PFs of early- and late-born GrCs during an operant task and presentation of a panel of sensory, appetitive, and aversive stimuli. We found modest differences in the proportions of early- and late-born GrCs encoding of a subset of movement and reward parameters. Together, these results reveal a contribution of GrC birth timing to their input wiring and diverse encoding properties.