首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        


Multicenter Randomized Double-Blind Comparison of Nebivolol plus HCTZ and Irbesartan plus HCTZ in the Treatment of Isolated Systolic Hypertension in Elderly Patients: Results of the NEHIS Study
Authors:Guido Grassi  Gino Seravalle  Gianmaria Brambilla  Raffaella Dell’Oro  Fosca Quarti Trevano  Francesco Fici  Luc van Bortel  Giuseppe Mancia
Institution:1.Clinica Medica,Università Milano-Bicocca,Milan,Italy;2.Clinica medica,Università Milano- Bioccca, Milan Italy and Istituto di Ricerca a Carattere Scientifico IRCCS Multimedica,Milan,Italy;3.Istituto Auxologico Italiano IRCCS,Milan,Italy;4.Clinical Pharmacology Research Unit, Heymans Institute of Pharmacology,Ghent University,Ghent,Belgium
Abstract:

Introduction

The present study was aimed at comparing the antihypertensive efficacy, tolerability, and side effects profile of nebivolol/hydrochlorothiazide (NH) vs irbesartan/hydrochlorothiazide (IH) combination in elderly patients with isolated systolic hypertension (ISH).

Methods

124 ISH patients aged 69.1 ± 5.1 years (mean ± SD) were enrolled by 13 general practitioners in Netherlands and Belgium and randomized in a double-blind fashion to receive either NH (5/12.5 mg day, n = 62) or IH (150/12.5 mg day, n = 62) for a 12-week period. The primary efficacy endpoint of the study was the comparison of the two combinations in terms of sitting office systolic blood pressure (BP) reduction after 12 weeks of treatment. In addition ambulatory BP, 24-h BP variability, tolerability, and safety profile were also investigated.

Results

122 patients were included in the intention-to-treat analysis. After 12 weeks of treatment the reduction of systolic BP with NH was significantly greater than IH (?25.8 ± 12 vs ?21.2 ± 14 mm Hg, P < 0.03). Diastolic BP reduction was significantly greater with NH after 4 and 8 weeks of treatment but similar at the end of the study (or after 12 weeks). In contrast, the magnitude of the 24-h, daytime, and nighttime systolic and diastolic BP reduction was almost similar in the two groups, while heart rate reduction induced by NH was significantly (P < 0.001) greater during the 24-h, daytime, and nighttime period than that induced by IH. NH caused a reduction in 24-h BP variability significantly greater than IH (standard deviation ?4.4 ± 2.7 vs ?2.2 ± 5.1 mm Hg, P < 0.02, variation coefficient ?2.0 ± 2.6 vs ?0.3 ± 3.4%, P < 0.01). Both treatment regimens were well tolerated.

Conclusions

These data provide evidence that NH reduces office BP more than IH but has similar effects on 24-h BP. NH reduces 24-h systolic and diastolic BP variability more than IH, suggesting a greater protective effect on a variable known to adversely affect prognosis.

Trial Registration

EU clinical Trials Register identifier, 2010-023104-28.

Funding

Menarini International Operations Luxembourg.
Keywords:
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号