腹腔镜手术与小切口手术在胆囊切除临床应用的疗效比较 |
| |
引用本文: | 石珩.腹腔镜手术与小切口手术在胆囊切除临床应用的疗效比较[J].按摩与导引,2010(28):41-43. |
| |
作者姓名: | 石珩 |
| |
作者单位: | 河南省宁陵县人民医院,宁陵476700 |
| |
摘 要: | 目的:探讨腹腔镜手术与小切口手术在胆囊切除术临床应用的疗效.方法:将我院就诊的80例需实施胆囊切除术的胆囊疾病患者随机分为A组和B组,A组实行腹部小切口胆囊切除术,B组实行腹腔镜胆囊切除术,对两组的治疗效果进行比较.结果:与A组比较,B组术中出血少、术后肠功能恢复时间与住院天数缩短,具有统计学差异.同时B组有缩短手术时间的趋势,但不存统计学差异.结论:腹腔镜胆囊切除术对于腹部小切口胆囊切除术拥有明显的优势,应当广泛推广应用.
|
关 键 词: | 腹腔镜手术 小切口手术 胆囊切除 |
The peritoneoscope surgery and the small margin surgery excise the clinical practice in the gallbladder the curative effect to compare |
| |
Abstract: | Objective. Discusses the peritoneoscope surgery and the small margin surgery in the gallbladder excision method clinical practice curative effect. Methods. The gallbladder disease patient who must implement my courtyard seeing a doctor 80 examples the gallbladder excision method divides into stochastically A group and B group, A group implements the abdomen small margin gallbladder excision method,B group implements the peritoneoscope gallbladder excision method,carries on the comparison to two group of treatment results. Results. Compares with A group, in B group of techniques bleeds few, the technique posterior intestine function restores the time and in hospital number of days reduces,has statistics difference. Simultaneously B group has the reduction surgery time tendency, but does not save statistics difference. Conclusion.The peritoneoscope gallbladder excision method has the obvious superiority regarding the abdomen small margin gallbladder excision method, must widely promote the application. |
| |
Keywords: | The peritoneoscope surgery Small margin surgery Gallbladder excises |
本文献已被 维普 等数据库收录! |
|