首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

不同术式治疗高血压脑出血的临床研究
引用本文:李在雨,罗毅男,金美善,陈大伟,师朋强,许晓光. 不同术式治疗高血压脑出血的临床研究[J]. 大连医科大学学报, 2012, 34(1): 60-63
作者姓名:李在雨  罗毅男  金美善  陈大伟  师朋强  许晓光
作者单位:1. 吉林大学第一医院脑外科,吉林 长春,130021
2. 吉林大学第一医院病理科,吉林 长春,130021
3. 大连医科大学附属第二医院脑外科,辽宁 大连,116027
摘    要:[目的]探讨治疗高血压脑出血(hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage,HICH)适宜的手术方法,为临床治疗提供依据。[方法]212例高血压脑出血分为开颅组与钻孔引流组,根据术前出血部位、血肿量、意识状况分别采取骨瓣开颅血肿清除术和钻孔穿刺抽吸引流术,观察术后24 h GCS评分、FAM、ADL,了解其预后。[结果]微创钻孔引流平均手术时间(1.0±0.5)h较骨瓣开颅平均手术时间(4.5±1.6)h明显缩短(P<0.05);术后3 d内再出血率微创钻孔引流组6/102(5.88%),开颅组5/110(4.55%)(P>0.05);微创钻孔引流组术后24 h平均GCS评分(12.47±5.16)、FAM(15.34±2.57)、ADL比例(优良76.47%)高于延迟开颅组GCS评分(10.23±4.83)、FAM(12.67±2.18)、ADL(优良55.77%)(P<0.05);微创钻孔引流组死亡22/102(21.57%),开颅组早期术后死亡12/58(20.69%),延迟术后死亡16/52(30.77%),死亡率延迟组高于微创钻孔引流组和早期组(P<0.05)。[结论]严格掌握手术适应证,早期进行微创手术治疗可获得满意效果。

关 键 词:高血压脑出血  骨瓣开颅血肿清除术  微创钻孔血肿抽吸引流术
收稿时间:2011-09-27
修稿时间:2011-12-08

Clinical therapeutic effect of different surgical approaches on the hypertensive intracerebral
LI Zai-yu , LUO Yi-nan , JIN Mei-shan , CHEN Da-wei , SHI Peng-qiang , XU Xiao-guang. Clinical therapeutic effect of different surgical approaches on the hypertensive intracerebral[J]. Journal of Dalian Medical University, 2012, 34(1): 60-63
Authors:LI Zai-yu    LUO Yi-nan    JIN Mei-shan    CHEN Da-wei    SHI Peng-qiang    XU Xiao-guang
Affiliation:1.Department of Neurological Surgery,2.Department of Pathology,the First Hospital of Jilin University,Changchun 130021,China;3.Department of Neurological Surgery,the Second Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University,Dalian 116027,China)
Abstract:[Objective]To evaluate and explore the appropriate operation method for hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage(HICH).[Methods]The operations of learning hematoma by craniotomy with bone flap were performed in 110 cases and the other 102 cases of HICH had minimally invasive puncture suction drainage according to the situation and volume of hemorrhage and consciousness status.The 24 h GCS score,FAM and ADL were assessed for the prognosis of the two operations.[Results]The average operation time of the minimally invasive puncture suction drainage was(1.0±0.5)h,shorter than that of craniotomy with bone flap,(4.5±1.6)h(P<0.05).In addition,re-bleeding rate had no difference in minimally invasive puncture suction drainage and craniotomy with bone flap after three days of the operation,5.88%(6/102) vs 4.55%(5/110) respectively(P>0.05).Furthermore,the GCS score(12.47±5.16),FAM(15.34±2.57) and ADL rate(76.47%) in minimally invasive puncture aspiration drainage were higher than those in craniotomy with bone flap,GCS score(10.23±4.83),FAM(12.67±2.18),high ADL rate(55.77%) respectively(P<0.05).Finally,the postoperative mortality,30.77%(16/52) was higher in delayed craniotomy group than that in minimally invasive puncture aspiration drainage,21.57%(22/102) and early craniotomy group 20.69%(12/58,P<0.05).[Conclusion]To grasp surgical indications strictly are needed and early minimally invasive surgery can obtain satisfactory results at hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage(HICH) patients.
Keywords:hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage(HICH)  clearance of hematoma by craniotomy with bone flap  suction and drainage of hematoma by minimally invasive drilling surgery
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《大连医科大学学报》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《大连医科大学学报》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号