Liver regeneration: a critical toxicodynamic response in predictive toxicology

The objective of the present review is to discuss the importance tissue repair in the mixture risk assessment. Studies have revealed the existence of two stages of toxicity: an inflictive stage (stage I) and progressive or regressive stage (stage II). While much is known about mechanisms by which injury is inflicted (stage I), very little is known about the mechanisms that lead to progression or regression of injury. A wide variety of additional experimental evidence suggests that tissue repair impacts decisively on the final toxic outcome and any modulation in this response has profound impact in the final outcome of toxicity. We designed the present research to investigate the importance of tissue repair in the final acute hepatotoxic outcome upon exposures to mixture of toxicants comprising thioacetamide (TA), allyl alcohol (AA), chloroform (CHCl(3)) and trichloroethylene (TCE). Dose response studies with individual compounds, binary mixtures (BM), ternary (TM) and quaternary mixtures (QM) have been conducted. Results of CHCl(3) + AA BM Anand, S.S., Murthy, S.N., Vishal, V.S., Mumtaz, M.M., Mehendale, H.M., 2003. Tissue repair plays pivotal role in final outcome of supra-additive liver injury after chloroform and allyl alcohol binary mixture. Food Chem. Toxicol. 41, 1123] and CHCl(3) + AA + TA +TCE QM Soni, M.G., Ramaiah, S.K., Mumtaz, M.M., Clewell, H., Mehendale, H.M., 1999. Toxicant-inflicted injury and stimulated tissue repair are opposing toxicodynamic forces in predictive toxicology. Regul. Phramcol. Toxicol. 19, 165], and two representative individual compounds (TA and AA) Mangipudy, R.S., Chanda, S., Mehendale, H.M., 1995a. Tissue repair response as a function of dose in thioacetamide hepatotoxicity. Environ. Health Perspect. 103, 260; Soni, M.G., Ramaiah, S.K., Mumtaz, M.M., Clewell, H., Mehendale, H.M., 1999. Toxicant-inflicted injury and stimulated tissue repair are opposing toxicodynamic forces in predictive toxicology. Regul. Phramcol. Toxicol. 19, 165] are described in this review. In addition, modulation of tissue repair in the outcome of hepatotoxicity and its implications in the risk assessment have been discussed. Male Sprague-Dawley (S-D) rats (250-300g) received a single i.p. injection of individual toxicants as well as mixtures. Liver injury was assessed by plasma alanine amino transferase (ALT) and histopathology. Tissue regeneration response was measured by (3)H]-thymidine ((3)H-T) incorporation into hepatocellular nuclear DNA and PCNA. Only ALT and (3)H-T data have been presented in this review for the sake of simplicity. Studies with individual hepatotoxicants showed a dose-related increase in injury as well as tissue repair up to a threshold dose. Beyond this threshold, tissue repair was inhibited, and liver injury progressed leading to mortality. Since the highest dose of individual compounds resulted in mortality, this dose was not employed for mixture studies. While CHCl(3) + AA BM caused supra-additive liver injury, QM caused additive liver injury. Due to the prompt and robust compensatory tissue repair, all the rats exposed to BM survived. With QM, the rats receiving the highest dose combination experienced some mortality consequent to the progression of liver injury attendant to suppressed tissue repair. These findings suggest that liver tissue repair, the opposing biological response that restores tissue lost to injury, may play a critical and determining role in the outcome of liver injury regardless of the number of toxicants in the mixture or the mechanism of initiation of injury. These data suggest that inclusion of this response in risk assessment might help in fine-tuning the prediction of toxic outcomes.