Fluid and pain management in liver surgery (MILESTONE): A worldwide study among surgeons and anesthesiologists |
| |
Authors: | Timothy H. Mungroop Bart F. Geerts Denise P. Veelo Timothy M. Pawlik Aurélie Bonnet Mickaël Lesurtel Koen M. Reyntjens Takehiro Noji Chao Liu Eduard Jonas Christopher L. Wu Eduardo de Santibañes Mohammed Abu Hilal Markus W. Hollmann Marc G. Besselink Thomas M. van Gulik |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands;2. Department of Anesthesiology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands;3. Department of Surgery, the Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH;4. Department of Anesthesiology, Croix Rousse University Hospital, University of Lyon, France;5. Department of Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Croix Rousse University Hospital, University of Lyon, France;6. Department of Anesthesiology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, the Netherlands;7. Department of Gastroenterological Surgery II, Faculty of Medicine Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan;8. Department of Surgery, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Guangzhou, China;9. Department of Surgery, University of Cape Town/Groote Schuur Hospital, Cape Town, South Africa;10. Department of Anesthesiology, the Hospital for Special Surgery/Weill Cornell Medical College; New York, NY;11. Department of Surgery, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Argentina;12. Department of Surgery, University of Southampton NHS, Southampton, UK |
| |
Abstract: | BackgroundFluid and pain management during liver surgery (eg, low central venous pressure) is a classic topic of controversy between anesthesiologists and surgeons. Little is known about practices worldwide. The aim of this study was to assess perioperative practices in liver surgery among and between surgeons and anesthesiologists worldwide that could guide the design of future international studies.MethodsAn online questionnaire was sent to 22 societies, including 4 international hepatopancreatobiliary societies, the American Society of Anesthesiologists, and 17 other (inter-)national societies.ResultsA total of 913 participants (495 surgeons and 418 anesthesiologists) from 66 countries were surveyed. A large heterogeneity in fluid management practices was identified, with 66% using low central venous pressure, 22% goal-directed fluid therapy, and 6% normovolemia. In addition, large heterogeneity was found regarding pain management practices, with 49% using epidural analgesia, 25% patient-controlled analgesia with opioids, and 12% regional techniques. Most participants assume that there is a relation between perioperative pain management and morbidity and mortality (78% of surgeons vs 89% of anesthesiologists; P < .001). Both surgeons and anesthesiologists have the highest expectations for minimally invasive surgery and enhanced recovery pathways for improving outcomes in liver surgery. No clear differences between continents were found.ConclusionWorldwide there is a large heterogeneity in fluid and pain management practices in liver surgery. This survey identified several areas of interest for future international studies aiming to improve outcomes in liver surgery. |
| |
Keywords: | Corresponding author: Department of Surgery Cancer Center Amsterdam Amsterdam UMC University of Amsterdam IWO IA.1-118 Meibergdreef 9 PO Box 22660 1100 DD Amsterdam the Netherlands. Tel.: +31 20 566 9111 |
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录! |
|