首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        

床位利用指数法、目标分析最优指数法和秩和比法在医院床位利用效率评价中的应用
引用本文:钟贵陵,王晓明.床位利用指数法、目标分析最优指数法和秩和比法在医院床位利用效率评价中的应用[J].中国医院统计,2004,11(2):114-116.
作者姓名:钟贵陵  王晓明
作者单位:210016,南京军区联勤部卫生部,江苏省南京市
摘    要:目的评价某军区2002年度部分驻军医院床位利用效率,并对不同评价方法进行比较.方法采用床位利用指数法、目标分析最优指数法和秩和比法(RSR).结果三种方法评价结果基本一致.床位利用效率较高的前5家医院分别是p医院、b医院、h医院、n医院和g医院,k医院、e医院、i医院、c医院、j医院和f医院排序靠后.结论总体上,该军区2002年度驻军医院床位利用比较高效、合理.三种方法评价床位利用效率是等效的,评价结果可信.

关 键 词:驻军医院  床位利用效率  评价
文章编号:1006-5253(2004)02-0114-03
修稿时间:2003年4月16日

Application of Bed-using Index Analysis, Best Index in Aim Analysis and RSR in Evaluating Bed-using Efficiency
Zhong Guiling,Wang Xiaoming. Health Ministry of Nanjing Military Command,Nanjing.Application of Bed-using Index Analysis, Best Index in Aim Analysis and RSR in Evaluating Bed-using Efficiency[J].Chinese Journal of Hospital Statistics,2004,11(2):114-116.
Authors:Zhong Guiling  Wang Xiaoming Health Ministry of Nanjing Military Command  Nanjing
Institution:Zhong Guiling,Wang Xiaoming. Health Ministry of Nanjing Military Command,Nanjing,210016
Abstract:Objective To evaluate the bed-using efficiency of station hospitals in a military command in 2002 and compare the results of different evaluation methods. Methods Bed-using index analysis, best index in aim analysis and RSR were used. Results The results of evaluation by three methods were the same. Bed-using of p, b, h, n and g hospital was efficiellt, and the efficiencies of k, e, i, c, j and f hospital were drop behind. Conclusion The bed-using of station hospitals in the military command in 2002 was efficient and reasonable in total. Three methods were consistent with each other in the evaluation of hospital bed-using efficiency. The results of evaluation were credible.
Keywords:Station hospital  Bed-using efficiency  Evaluation
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号