首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


Transcranial direct current stimulation and constraint-induced therapy in cerebral palsy: A randomized,blinded, sham-controlled clinical trial
Authors:Bernadette Gillick  Tonya Rich  Samuel Nemanich  Chao-Ying Chen  Jeremiah Menk  Bryon Mueller  Mo Chen  Marcie Ward  Gregg Meekins  Tim Feyma  Linda Krach  Kyle Rudser
Affiliation:1. Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Minnesota, 420 Delaware St SE, MMC 388, Minneapolis, MN, 55455, USA;2. School of Public Health, Division of Biostatistics, University of Minnesota, 420 Delaware St SE, MMC 303, Minneapolis, MN, 55455, USA;3. Department of Psychiatry, University of Minnesota, 2450 Riverside Ave. S, Minneapolis, MN, 55454, USA;4. Institute for Engineering and Medicine, University of Minnesota, 420 Delaware St. SE, MMC 609, Minneapolis, MN, 55455, USA;5. Gillette Children''s Specialty Healthcare, 200 East University Ave., St. Paul, MN, 55101, USA;6. Department of Neurology, University of Minnesota, 420 Delaware St SE, MMC 295, Minneapolis, MN, 55455, USA;g. Courage Kenny Rehabilitation Institute, 800 East 28th St., Minneapolis, MN, 55407, USA
Abstract:We investigated the safety, feasibility, and efficacy of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) combined with constraint-induced movement therapy (CIMT) in children and young adults with unilateral cerebral palsy. Twenty participants were randomized to receive active or sham tDCS. The intervention consisted of 10 consecutive weekday sessions of tDCS applied to the non-lesioned hemisphere (20 min) concurrently with CIMT (120 min). Participants, caregivers, and interventionists were blinded to group assignment. The primary safety outcome investigated adverse events. The primary behavioral outcome was the Assisting Hand Assessment. All 20 participants (mean age = 12.7 yrs, range = 7.4–21.6 years) were evaluated for the primary outcomes. No serious adverse events occurred, and the most commonly reported minor adverse events were headache and itchiness. Both groups demonstrated a significant improvement in hand function after the intervention, although no significant effect of tDCS was observed (between-group difference = ?2.18, 95% CI = [?6.48, 2.12], p = 0.30). Although hand function improved overall, no significant differences between intervention groups were found. Children with preserved corticospinal tract circuitry from the lesioned hemisphere, compared to those without, showed greater improvement in hand function (mean difference = 3.04, 95% CI = [?0.64, 6.72], p = 0.099). Our study demonstrates the safety and feasibility of serial sessions of tDCS, and presents preliminary evidence for the effect of CST circuitry on outcomes following tDCS/CIMT. Future work in children with unilateral cerebral palsy should focus on the optimal dosing and consider individual brain circuitry when describing response to combined interventions.

Clinical Trials Registration

Clinicaltrials.govNCT 02250092.
Keywords:Unilateral cerebral palsy  Rehabilitation  Transcranial direct current stimulation  Constraint-induced movement therapy  tDCS  Transcranial direct current stimulation  TMS  Transcranial magnetic stimulation  NIBS  Non-invasive brain stimulation  UCP  Unilateral cerebral palsy  CIMT  Constraint-induced movement therapy  MEP  Motor evoked potential  CST  Corticospinal tract  M1  Primary motor cortex  SO  Supraorbital  AHA  Assisting Hand Assessment  COPM  Canadian Occupational Performance Measure
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号