Transcranial direct current stimulation and constraint-induced therapy in cerebral palsy: A randomized,blinded, sham-controlled clinical trial |
| |
Authors: | Bernadette Gillick Tonya Rich Samuel Nemanich Chao-Ying Chen Jeremiah Menk Bryon Mueller Mo Chen Marcie Ward Gregg Meekins Tim Feyma Linda Krach Kyle Rudser |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Minnesota, 420 Delaware St SE, MMC 388, Minneapolis, MN, 55455, USA;2. School of Public Health, Division of Biostatistics, University of Minnesota, 420 Delaware St SE, MMC 303, Minneapolis, MN, 55455, USA;3. Department of Psychiatry, University of Minnesota, 2450 Riverside Ave. S, Minneapolis, MN, 55454, USA;4. Institute for Engineering and Medicine, University of Minnesota, 420 Delaware St. SE, MMC 609, Minneapolis, MN, 55455, USA;5. Gillette Children''s Specialty Healthcare, 200 East University Ave., St. Paul, MN, 55101, USA;6. Department of Neurology, University of Minnesota, 420 Delaware St SE, MMC 295, Minneapolis, MN, 55455, USA;g. Courage Kenny Rehabilitation Institute, 800 East 28th St., Minneapolis, MN, 55407, USA |
| |
Abstract: | We investigated the safety, feasibility, and efficacy of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) combined with constraint-induced movement therapy (CIMT) in children and young adults with unilateral cerebral palsy. Twenty participants were randomized to receive active or sham tDCS. The intervention consisted of 10 consecutive weekday sessions of tDCS applied to the non-lesioned hemisphere (20 min) concurrently with CIMT (120 min). Participants, caregivers, and interventionists were blinded to group assignment. The primary safety outcome investigated adverse events. The primary behavioral outcome was the Assisting Hand Assessment. All 20 participants (mean age = 12.7 yrs, range = 7.4–21.6 years) were evaluated for the primary outcomes. No serious adverse events occurred, and the most commonly reported minor adverse events were headache and itchiness. Both groups demonstrated a significant improvement in hand function after the intervention, although no significant effect of tDCS was observed (between-group difference = ?2.18, 95% CI = [?6.48, 2.12], p = 0.30). Although hand function improved overall, no significant differences between intervention groups were found. Children with preserved corticospinal tract circuitry from the lesioned hemisphere, compared to those without, showed greater improvement in hand function (mean difference = 3.04, 95% CI = [?0.64, 6.72], p = 0.099). Our study demonstrates the safety and feasibility of serial sessions of tDCS, and presents preliminary evidence for the effect of CST circuitry on outcomes following tDCS/CIMT. Future work in children with unilateral cerebral palsy should focus on the optimal dosing and consider individual brain circuitry when describing response to combined interventions. |
| |
Keywords: | Unilateral cerebral palsy Rehabilitation Transcranial direct current stimulation Constraint-induced movement therapy tDCS Transcranial direct current stimulation TMS Transcranial magnetic stimulation NIBS Non-invasive brain stimulation UCP Unilateral cerebral palsy CIMT Constraint-induced movement therapy MEP Motor evoked potential CST Corticospinal tract M1 Primary motor cortex SO Supraorbital AHA Assisting Hand Assessment COPM Canadian Occupational Performance Measure |
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录! |
|