湿润烧伤膏治疗烧伤总面积>50%TBSA患者的疗效观察

目的观察应用湿润烧伤膏治疗大面积烧伤患者的疗效。方法1991年6月-2003年12月，将笔者单位收治的入院前曾用湿润烧伤膏治疗烧伤总面积〉50％TBSA的患者298例作为观察组；随机抽取同期大面积烧伤患者300例作为对照组，其创面应用磺胺嘧啶银（SD—Ag）冷霜治疗。观察两组患者的细菌培养情况、主要伤情变化及病死率。结果观察组培养出菌株1506株，主要伤情变化9种1679例次，病死率20．8％；对照组培养出菌株353株，主要伤情变化9种518例次，病死率4．7％。两组主要伤情变化及病死率问比较，差异有统计学意义（P〈0．01）。结论采用湿润烧伤膏治疗大面积烧伤患者，其疗效不及SD—Ag冷霜。

Clinical observation of the efficacy of MEBO in the treatment of burn patients with burn area over 50% TBSA

Objective To observe the effectiveness of MEBO in the treatment of burn patients with burn area over 50% TBSA. Methods Two hundred and ninety-eight patients hospitalized in our hospital from May of 1991 to December of 2003 with burn area over 50% TBSA, who had MEBO treatment before hospitalization, were enrolled in the study as the experiment (E) group. Another group of 300 burn patients with burn area over 50% TBSA that treated with SD-Ag cream were enrolled in the study as the control(C) group. Bacterial culture results, major changes in injury and mortality were compared between the two groups. Results There were 1 506 bacteria strains isolated from wounds in E group, and 9 main changes in injury ( 1679 cases) occurred with 20.8% mortality in this group. There were 353 bacteria strains isolated, with occurrence of 9 changes in injury (518 cases) and 4.7% mortality in the SD-Ag group. Conclusion MEBO is much less effective for the treatment of the burn patients with large burn area compared with SD-Ag cream treatment.