首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        

综合性干预措施对神经症患者康复的影响
引用本文:林以环,王俊清,郭少玲.综合性干预措施对神经症患者康复的影响[J].中华现代护理杂志,2011,17(12):1385-1386.
作者姓名:林以环  王俊清  郭少玲
作者单位:汕头大学精神卫生中心工娱疗室,515063
基金项目:汕头市重点科技计划项目
摘    要:目的探索综合性干预措施在神经症患者护理中的作用。方法48例神经症住院患者随机分为对照组(药物治疗)和观察组(药物治疗加综合性干预措施)各24例,分别于治疗前、治疗后(8周后)评定焦虑自评量表(SAS)、抑郁自评量表(SDS)。结果治疗前,两组患者SAS、SDS比较差异均无统计学意义(P〉0.05)。治疗后,观察组SAS、SDS减分率优于对照组,组问比较差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05),观察组临床疗效优于对照组(P〈0.05)。结论综合性干预措施能有效改善神经症患者抑郁、焦虑情绪,提高治愈率,促进疾病的康复。

关 键 词:神经症  护理  综合性干预措施

Comprehensive intervention technique in neuroses nursing
LIN Yi-huan,WANG Jun-qing,GUO Shao-ling.Comprehensive intervention technique in neuroses nursing[J].Chinese Journal of Modern Nursing,2011,17(12):1385-1386.
Authors:LIN Yi-huan  WANG Jun-qing  GUO Shao-ling
Institution:LIN Yi-huan, WANG Jun-qing, GUO Shoo- ling. Mental Health Center; Shantou University, Shantou 515063, China
Abstract:Objective To explore the effect of comprehensive intervention technique in neuroses nursing.Methods 48 inpatient neuroses were randomly divided into observation group(drug treatment and comprehensive intervention technique)and control group(drug treatment),using self-rating anxiety scale(SAS)and self-rating depression scale(SDS)to evaluate clinical symptoms before and after 2 months treatment.Results Before treatment.SAS and SDS scores between two patient groups had no statistic difference(P>0.05),but after 2 months treatment.the observation group had lower SAS and SDS scores than the control group,the difference were obvious(P<0.05).Conclusions Comprehensive intervention technique was useful in neuroses nursing which can ameliorate depression and anxiety emotions,improve illness recover.
Keywords:Neuroses  Nursing  Comprehensive intervention technique
本文献已被 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号