首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

两种教学方法在皮肤性病学教学中的比较研究
引用本文:刘方,何焱玲,程少为,张秀英,佟春光,曹梅,刘春玲,田永静. 两种教学方法在皮肤性病学教学中的比较研究[J]. 中国病案, 2013, 0(3): 54-56
作者姓名:刘方  何焱玲  程少为  张秀英  佟春光  曹梅  刘春玲  田永静
作者单位:刘方 (100020,北京市 首都医科大学附属北京朝阳医院皮肤科); 何焱玲 (100020,北京市 首都医科大学附属北京朝阳医院皮肤科); 程少为 (100020,北京市 首都医科大学附属北京朝阳医院皮肤科); 张秀英 (100020,北京市 首都医科大学附属北京朝阳医院皮肤科); 佟春光 (100020,北京市 首都医科大学附属北京朝阳医院皮肤科); 曹梅 (100020,北京市 首都医科大学附属北京朝阳医院皮肤科); 刘春玲 (100020,北京市 首都医科大学附属北京朝阳医院皮肤科); 田永静 (100020,北京市 首都医科大学附属北京朝阳医院皮肤科);
基金项目:首都医科大学校长基金(项目编号:09JYY,-048)
摘    要:目的改革皮肤性病学的教学方法,探讨新的教学方法并与传统教学方法相比较。方法本校2006级五年制本科生66人随机分为甲乙两组,甲组采用以问题为导向的教学方法(problem-based learning,PBL),乙组采用传统的以教师讲授为主要教学(1eeture basedlearning,LBL)方法。考试成绩采用两段式计分方式:笔试占60%,病历书写和病例分析占40%。结果甲组总分的均数为72.0933±6.18892,乙组总分的均数为75.2941±9.56334,对两组总分进行比较,进行两独立样本的t检验,P〉O.05(双侧),两组间考试成绩没有显著性差异。结论新的教学方法没有显示出明显的优势。

关 键 词:皮肤性病学  以问题为导向的教学方法  教学改革  探索

The Comparative Study of Two Teaching Methods in the Teaching of Dermatology and Venereology
Liu Fang,He Yanling,Cheng Shaowei,Zhang Xiuying,Tong Chunguang,Cao Mei,Liu Chunling,Tian Yongjing. The Comparative Study of Two Teaching Methods in the Teaching of Dermatology and Venereology[J]. Chinese Medical Record, 2013, 0(3): 54-56
Authors:Liu Fang  He Yanling  Cheng Shaowei  Zhang Xiuying  Tong Chunguang  Cao Mei  Liu Chunling  Tian Yongjing
Affiliation:( Dermatology Department, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital Affiliated to Capital Medical University, Beijing 100020, China)
Abstract:Objective To reform the teaching method of dermatology and venereology, explore a new teaching method and compare with the traditional teaching method. Methods Sixty-six undergraduates of grade 06 of the five-year-training system were classified into two groups named as group A and group B according to the random prijaciple. Group A received the problem - based learning (PBL), while group B received the lecture-based learning (LBL). Score including two parts: written test occupying 60%, case history and analysis occupying 40%. Reslllts The results showed that the mean score of group A and B was 72.0933 ± 6.18892 and 75. 2941 ± 9.56334 respectively. T test of the two independent samples showed P 〉 0.05 (two tailed). There was no obvious statistical significance between group A and B. Collclusions New teaching method don't show obvious predominance.
Keywords:Dermatology and Venerology  Problem-based learning  Reform of teaching  Research
本文献已被 维普 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号