Adhesion procedures for CAD/CAM indirect resin composite block: A new resin primer versus a conventional silanizing agent |
| |
| Affiliation: | 1. Department of Prosthodontics, Gerodontology and Oral Rehabilitation, Osaka University Graduate School of Dentistry, 1-8 Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka 565-0871, Japan;2. Division of Comprehensive Prosthodontics, Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, 2-5274 Gakkocho-dori, Niigata 951-8514, Japan;3. Department of Preventive Cardiology, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center, 6-1 Kishibe-Shimmachi, Suita, Osaka, 564-8565, Japan;4. Osaka University, 1-8 Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka 565-0871, Japan;5. Department of Preventive Medicine and Epidemiology, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center, 5-7-1, Fujishiro-dai, Suita, Osaka 565-8565, Japan;1. Nihon University Graduate School of Dentistry at Matsudo, Removable Prosthodontics, Matsudo, Japan;2. Department of Removable Prosthodontics, Nihon University School of Dentistry at Matsudo, Matsudo, 2-870-1 Sakaecho-nishi, Chiba 271-8587, Japan;3. Department of Anesthesiology, Nihon University School of Dentistry at Matsudo, Matsudo, Japan |
| |
| Abstract: | PurposeThe purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of both a resin primer containing methyl methacrylate (MMA) and a silanizing agent on bonding to indirect resin composite blocks, using two types of build-up hybrid resin composites.MethodsSHOFU BLOCK HC (Shofu) specimens were blasted with alumina, after which one of two surface treatments was applied: CERA RESIN BOND (Shofu, the Silane group) or HC primer (Shofu, the MMA group). Resin composites made using either Solidex Hardura (SDH, Shofu) or Ceramage Duo (CMD, Shofu) were built up and micro-tensile bond strength (μTBS) values were measured after storage in water for either 24 h or 6 months (n = 24 per group). The fracture surfaces after μTBS measurements and the resin block/build-up resin interfaces were observed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM).ResultsThe bond strength of the Silane/SDH group significantly decreased after 6 months (p < 0.001), whereas in the MMA group there was no significant loss after 24 h or 6 months (p = 0.99). In the CMD group, the bond strength after 6 months was significantly lowered in both the Silane group (p < 0.001) and the MMA group (p < 0.001), but the latter still showed greater adhesion. SEM images demonstrated that the matrix resin was partially destroyed at the fracture surfaces of the MMA group and fracture surface unevenness was observed.ConclusionsA primer containing MMA produced stronger bonding to CAD/CAM resin even after long-term aging compared to a silane treatment. |
| |
| Keywords: | Adhesive dentistry Microtensile bond strength SEM Longevity Durability |
| 本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录！ |
|
