Neck dissection in the management of regional metastases in patients with undifferentiated nasopharyngeal carcinomas

Residual regional disease after the primary treatment of nasopharyngeal carcinoma is still considered to be a therapeutic problem. The limitations of prophylactic radical radiation, further doses of irradiation as a useful salvage procedure, and the effects on vital structures were the reasons that we employed a therapeutic protocol consisting of radical neck dissection after 40 Gy of radiotherapy and a full tumor dose after surgery. The initial treatment consisted of chemotherapy. Between 1977 and 1991 surgical removal of residual neck metastases was performed in 44 patients with undifferentiated nasopharyngeal carcinomas who had regional metastases at the time of diagnosis. Fourteen patients (group A) had radical neck dissections after initial chemotherapy (using doxorubicin, etoposide, bleomycin and/or 5-fluouracil) and between two courses of locoregional radiotherapy. The remaining 30 patients (group B) were operated on after finishing chemotherapy and locoregional radiotherapy (group B 1) or receiving only full-dose locoregional radiotherapy (group B 2). All patients had histopathologically proven complete remission of primary tumors before neck surgery. The five-year survival rates for group A were 78%, 40% for group B 1 and 27% for group B 2. There were statistically significant differences between groups A and B (P < 0.01), but not between groups B 1 and B 2. In group A one patient died from subsequent distant metastases and two from local tumor recurrences. Twenty patients died in group B, regional relapses occurred in 40% of the patients in group B 1 and 33% in group B 2, while distant metastases developed in 40% of group B 2. These findings again showed that radical neck dissection was an effective approach for controlling neck disease. When performed after initial chemotherapy and between two courses of radiotherapy, surgery significantly improves the prognosis of patients with positive regional lymph nodes at the time of diagnosis. Received: 2 June 1998 / Accepted: 21 October 1998