Inverse probability weighting to control confounding in an illness‐death model for interval‐censored data |
| |
Authors: | Florence Gillaizeau Thomas Sénage Florent Le Borgne Thierry Le Tourneau Jean‐Christian Roussel Karen Leffondrè Raphaël Porcher Bruno Giraudeau Etienne Dantan Yohann Foucher |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. SPHERE, INSERM UMR 1246, Nantes University, Tours University, France;2. INSERM CR1064, France;3. Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nantes, Nantes, France;4. Department of Statistical Science, University College London, London, U.K.;5. Department of Thoracic and CardioVascular Surgery, Nantes Hospital University, France;6. A2COM‐IDBC, Nantes, France;7. INSERM UMR1087, CNRS UMR 6291, l'Institut du Thorax, Nantes University, France;8. ISPED, Centre INSERM U897 Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France;9. METHODS Team, INSERM UMR 1153, Centre de Recherche épidémiologie et Statistique Sorbonne Paris Cité, Paris, France;10. INSERM CIC1415, CHRU de Tours, Tours, France |
| |
Abstract: | Multistate models with interval‐censored data, such as the illness‐death model, are still not used to any considerable extent in medical research regardless of the significant literature demonstrating their advantages compared to usual survival models. Possible explanations are their uncommon availability in classical statistical software or, when they are available, by the limitations related to multivariable modelling to take confounding into consideration. In this paper, we propose a strategy based on propensity scores that allows population causal effects to be estimated: the inverse probability weighting in the illness semi‐Markov model with interval‐censored data. Using simulated data, we validated the performances of the proposed approach. We also illustrated the usefulness of the method by an application aiming to evaluate the relationship between the inadequate size of an aortic bioprosthesis and its degeneration or/and patient death. We have updated the R package multistate to facilitate the future use of this method. |
| |
Keywords: | confounding factors inverse probability weighting multistate propensity score semi‐Markov |
|
|