Guidelines for Appropriate Care: The Importance of Empirical Normative Analysis |
| |
Authors: | Marc Berg Ruud ter Meulen Masja van den Burg |
| |
Affiliation: | (1) Institute of Health Policy and Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, L4-117, P.O. Box 1738, 3000 DR Rotterdam, The Netherlands;(2) Institute for Health Ethics, Maastricht, The Netherlands;(3) Institute for Health Ethics, Maastricht, The Netherlands |
| |
Abstract: | The Royal Dutch Medical Association recently completed a researchproject aimed at investigating how guidelines for `appropriatemedical care' should be construed. The project took as a startingpoint that explicit attention should be given to ethical andpolitical considerations in addition to data about costs andeffectiveness. In the project, two research groups set out todesign guidelines and cost-effectiveness analyses (CEAs) for twocircumscribed medical areas (angina pectoris and majordepression). Our third group was responsible for the normativeanalysis. We undertook an explorative, qualitative pilot study ofthe normative considerations that played a role in constructingthe guidelines and CEAs, and simultaneously interviewedspecialists about the normative considerations that guided theirdiagnostic and treatment decisions. Explicating normativeconsiderations, we argue, is important democratically: the issuesat stake should not be left to decision analysts and guidelinedevelopers to decide. Moreover, it is a necessary condition for asuccessful implementation of such tools: those who draw uponthese tools will only accept them when they can recognizethemselves in the considerations implied. Empirical normativeanalysis, we argue, is a crucial tool in developing guidelinesfor appropriate medical care. |
| |
Keywords: | cost effectiveness analysis medical ethics practice guidelines qualitative evaluation |
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录! |
|