首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

加速康复外科策略与常规策略在腹腔镜前列腺癌根治术中的效价比较
引用本文:胡静萍,潘婧儒,程楠,周绍鹏,黑子清,周少丽. 加速康复外科策略与常规策略在腹腔镜前列腺癌根治术中的效价比较[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2019, 13(3): 158-161. DOI: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3253.2019.03.004
作者姓名:胡静萍  潘婧儒  程楠  周绍鹏  黑子清  周少丽
作者单位:1. 510630 广州,中山大学附属第三医院麻醉科
基金项目:广东省医学科研基金(2018117203550410)
摘    要:目的探讨基于多模式镇痛的加速康复外科(ERAS)理念应用于腹腔镜前列腺癌根治术中的优势。 方法回顾性分析2017年1月至12月我院同一组手术医师行腹腔镜下前列腺癌根治术患者围术期的相关资料,ERAS组患者11例,常规策略组患者24例。 结果两组患者年龄,ASA分级及心功能分级差异无统计学意义。ERAS组患者较常规治疗组术中补液量降低[(7.2±2.2)ml vs(10.7±3.8)ml/kg/h,P=0.009],术后住院时间明显减少[(7.5±2.8)d vs(10.3±2.8)d,P=0.008],术后首次排气时间缩短[(1.4±0.9)d vs(2.4±0.9)d,P=0.018]。ERAS组住院总费用及麻醉费用均较对照组增加[(75 129±21 217)元vs(55 201±19 109)元,P=0.009;(5 537±4 430) 元vs(3 121±726)元,P=0.01],而在总住院时间、麻醉费用所占住院总费用比例方面,两组差异无统计学意义。 结论在腹腔镜前列腺癌根治术中应用ERAS理念下多模式镇痛,可以加速患者胃肠道功能恢复,缩短术后住院时间,不增加围术期并发症的发生率。

关 键 词:加速康复外科  多模式镇痛  前列腺癌根治术  
收稿时间:2018-09-25

Comparison between enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) strategy and conventional strategy in laparoscopic radical prostatectomy
Jingping Hu,Jingru Pan,Nan Cheng,Shaopeng Zhou,Ziqing Hei,Shaoli Zhou. Comparison between enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) strategy and conventional strategy in laparoscopic radical prostatectomy[J]. , 2019, 13(3): 158-161. DOI: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3253.2019.03.004
Authors:Jingping Hu  Jingru Pan  Nan Cheng  Shaopeng Zhou  Ziqing Hei  Shaoli Zhou
Affiliation:1. Department of Anesthesiology, the Third Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510630 China
Abstract:ObjectiveTo explore the value of the enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) concept that based on multimodal analgesia in laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. MethodsPerioperative clinical data of patients underwent laparoscopic radical prostatectomy in our hospital from January 2017 to December 2017 were analyzed retrospectively. According to whether the patients received ERAS treatment, they were divided into ERAS group and control group. There were 11 patients in ERAS group received ERAS perioperative treatment. There were 24 patients in control group received traditional perioperative treatment. ResultsThere was no difference in age, ASA classification and cardiac function classification between the two groups. Compared with the control group, the ERAS group was significantly reduced in intraoperative infusion volume [(7.2±2.2) ml vs (10.7±3.8) ml/kg/h,P=0.009]. The postoperative hospitalization time was significantly shortened [(7.5±2.8) d vs (10.3±2.8) d,P=0.008]. The first time of anal exhaust after operation was shortened [(1.4±0.9) d vs (2.4±0.9) d,P=0.018]. Compared with the control group, the total cost of hospitalization and the anesthesia cost were both increased in ERAS group [(75 129±21 217) vs (55 201±19 109) yuan,P=0.009; (5 538±4 431) vs (3 122±726) yuan,P=0.01]. Besides, there was no difference in the length of total hospitalization time, the proportion of the anesthesia cost in total cost between the two groups. ConclusionThe application of ERAS concept that based on multimodal analgesia in laparoscopic radical prostatectomy enable to accelerate the recovery of gastrointestinal function of patients, shorten the postoperative hospitalization time, as well as, not to increase the occurrence of perioperative complications.
Keywords:Enhanced recovery after surgery  Multimodal analgesia  Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy  
本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版)》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版)》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号