国内护理领域高影响力期刊2016~2018年发表质性研究报告的质量评价

目的评价中国科学引文数据库(Chinese science citation database,CSCD)收录护理类期刊发表的质性研究报告质量。方法计算机检索CSCD数据库,搜集CSCD收录的4本护理期刊发表的质性研究,检索时限均为2016年1月至2018年12月。由2名研究者独立筛选文献和提取资料后,采用COREQ清单对纳入文献进行评价,使用SPSS 25.0软件进行统计分析。结果共纳入223篇质性研究,COREQ清单评价结果显示:43.8%(14/32)的条目充分报告率低于50%,其中78.6%(11/14)的条目充分报告率低于20%,条目4的充分报告率为0。亚组分析结果显示,被引频次是否≤5次和有无基金资助在COREQ各条目上的充分报告率差异无统计学意义。结论 CSCD收录护理类期刊发表的质性研究报告质量有待进一步提高,建议国内护理期刊在稿约中引入COREQ清单,并在编辑审稿和同行评议中严格执行。

The quality of qualitative research reports published by high-impact journals in the field of nursing in China from 2016 to 2018

Objectives To evaluate the reporting quality of individual/focus group interviews published in nursing journals included in the Chinese science citation database(CSCD). Methods CSCD database was electronically searched to collect qualitative studies published in nursing journals included in CSCD from January 2016 to December2018. Two researchers independently screened literatures, extracted data, and assessed the quality of included studies by COREQ guidelines, SPSS 25.0 software was then used for statistical analysis. Results A total of 223 qualitative researches were included. The results of COREQ evaluation showed that full report rate of 43.8%(14/32) studies were less than 50%,78.6%(11/14) were less than 20%, and the full report rate of item 4 was even 0%. There were no significant differences between different total cites and the availability of funding in COREQ guidelines. Conclusion The reporting quality of the qualitative researches published in the four nursing journals included in the CSCD requires further improvement.Therefore, we suggest that domestic nursing journals should introduce COREQ guidelines in contribution and strictly implement it in editorial review and peer review.