Risk factors for central venous catheter-related bloodstream infection: a 1073-patient study

We intended to evaluate the risk factors for catheter-related bloodstream infection (CR-BSI) with central venous (CV) catheters. For the hub of the CV line, we used three-way stopcocks in the first year of the study and closed needleless connectors (NCs) in the second year. Background factors included the age and sex of patients; the ward; the specialty service; the CV catheter and its days of placement; and the staff compounding the intravenous infusion, i.e., either nurses, who disinfect hands-free, or pharmacists using clean benches. Outcome factors included positive culture from the blood-related samples and the body temperature estimate. Of a total of 29 221 device-days in 1073 patients, positive cultures showed an overall incidence of 2.26 per 1000 device-days. Multivariate analysis showed a higher odds ratio of positive cultures for the ICU (odds ratio [OR], 4.415; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.054–9.490]) and for CV catheter placement for more than 30 days (OR, 7.529; 95% CI, 4.279–13.247), but no significance for male sex (OR, 1.752; 95% CI, 0.984–3.119) or for pharmacists’ compounding (OR, 2.150; 95% CI, 0.974–4.749). Univariate analysis showed no significance for the following factors: age more than 70 years (OR, 0.968; 95% CI 0.561–1.641), the surgery service (OR, 1.029; 95% CI, 0.582–1.818), double-lumen CV catheters (OR, 0.841; 95% CI, 0.465–1.521), or the NC (1.107; 95% CI, 0.673–1.821). We conclude that the theoretical benefit of the NC, the abolished dead space in the hub, contributed little to the outcomes of blood-related culture. The hands-free disinfection may have resulted in comparable odds ratios for the nurses and the pharmacists compounding the infusions.