Laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal versus open preperitoneal mesh repair for inguinal hernia recurrence: a decision analysis based on net health benefits

Background

The aim of this study is to evaluate the most cost-effective treatment strategy using preperitoneal mesh for patients with recurrent inguinal hernia. Currently, the issue of cost-effectiveness is entirely unresolved.

Methods

A decision analysis was carried out based on the results of a systematic literature review of articles concerning recurrent inguinal hernia repair that were published between 1979 and 2011. A virtual cohort was programmed to undergo three different treatment procedures: (1) laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal hernia repair (TEP), (2) open preperitoneal mesh repair according to Stoppa, and (3) open preperitoneal mesh repair according to Nyhus. We carried out a base-case analysis and varied all variables over a broad range of reasonable hypotheses in multiple one-way and two-way sensitivity analyses.

Results

The average cost-effectiveness ratio of Nyhus, Stoppa, and TEP per quality-adjusted life year was US $ ($)1,942, $1,948, and $2,011, respectively. In terms of the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER), Stoppa was dominated. The choice between TEP or Nyhus procedure depends on the combination of a specific center’s rates of recurrence and morbidity as disclosed by three-way sensitivity analysis.

Conclusions

Nyhus and TEP repairs are possible optimal choices depending primarily on the institution’s rates of recurrence and morbidity. Based on our net benefit-related decision analysis, a hypothetical “fixed budget trade-off” suggests potential annual incremental health system cost savings of $200,000 attained by shifting care for 1,000 patients from TEP to Nyhus repair (depending on clinical end-points, which is a decisive factor).