首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

左心房与双心房射频消融治疗心房纤颤的对比研究
引用本文:王坚刚,孟旭,李晖,韩杰,许春雷,崔永强. 左心房与双心房射频消融治疗心房纤颤的对比研究[J]. 中华医学杂志, 2008, 88(43)
作者姓名:王坚刚  孟旭  李晖  韩杰  许春雷  崔永强
作者单位:首都医科大学附属北京安贞医院心外科,100029
摘    要:目的 对比研究左心房和双心房射频消融治疗心房纤颤的临床疗效.方法 对北京安贞医院305例房颤患者进行射频消融,160例行双心房消融,另145例行左心房消融.其中男117例、女188例,年龄24~77岁,平均(53±10)岁.房颤病史平均(36±43)个月.瓣膜手术292例,14例合并冠状动脉旁路移植术.随访3~42个月,平均(28±5)个月.结果 手术死亡13例(4.3%),其中3例死于低心排综合征,7例死于多器官功能衰竭,1例死于左室破裂,1例死于猝死,1例死于心律失常.随访双心房组有3例死亡,1例死于脑出血,1例死于心功能不全,1例死因不详.全组术后窦性心律占73.1%(223/305),其中双心房组66.9%(107/160);左心房组80.0%(116/145)(P<0.05).最近随访的窦性心律维持率为80.8%,左心房组为81.9%,双心房组为80.0%(P>0.05).随访两组之间非房颤心律比较差异无统计学意义(P=0.33).术前左心房径线≥80 mm是房颤复发的风险因素.结论 左心房和双心房消融都是安全、有效的治疗房颤的外科方法 .如果手术不需要切开右心房或对于重症患者,单独左心房消融是一个合理的选择.

关 键 词:导管消融术  心房颤动  心房

Left versus bi-atrial radiofrequency ablation in the treatment of atrial fibrillation
WANG Jian-gang,MENG Xu,LI Hui,HAN Jie,XU Chun-lei,CUI Yong-qiang. Left versus bi-atrial radiofrequency ablation in the treatment of atrial fibrillation[J]. Zhonghua yi xue za zhi, 2008, 88(43)
Authors:WANG Jian-gang  MENG Xu  LI Hui  HAN Jie  XU Chun-lei  CUI Yong-qiang
Abstract:Objective To evaluate the effectiveness of radiofrequency modified maze operation for the treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF) and compare the results of the left versus bi-atrial procedures. Methods 305 patients of organic heart disease combined with AF, 117 males and 188 females, aged (53 ± 10), that underwent cardiac valve operation (n = 293) and/or coronary artery bypass graft surgery (n = 14), received concomitant atrial fibrillation, hi-atrial (n = 160) or left atrial (n = 145) with a mean duration of (36±43) months. Follow-up was conducted for (28±5)(3-42) months. Results Thirteen patients (4.3%) died postoperatively:7 died of muhisystem and organ failure, 3 of low cardiac output, 1 of rupture of left ventricle, 1 of arrhythmia, and 1 of sudden death. During the follow-up, 1 patient died of heart failure, 1 of encephalorrhagia and 1 of unknown reason in the bi-atrial group. At the end of the procedure 223 patients (73.1%) had sinus rhythm, with a sinus rhythm rate of 66.9% (107/160) in the hi-atrial group, significant lower than that in the left atrial group (80.0%, 116/145, P<0.05). At late follow-up, 215 of the 266 patients (80.8%) were in stable sinus rhythm. Sinus rhythm rate of the bi-atrial group was 80.0%, not significantly different from that of the left atrial group (81.9% ,P>0.05). The Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed there was no significant difference in the AF rhythm rate between these 2 groups (P = 0.33). Logistic regression analysis showed that the left atrial diameter of ≥ 80 mm was an independent predictor of AF recurrence. Conclusion Both the left and bi-atrial procedures are successful in terms of restoring sinus rhythm. Left atrial ablation in severe cases and where the incision of right atrium is nut needed is a reasonable choice.
Keywords:Catheter ablation  Atrial fibrillation  Heart atrim
本文献已被 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号