首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        


Magnetic resonance assessment of pelvic anatomy and pelvic floor disorders after childbirth
Authors:Victoria L Handa  Mark E Lockhart  Kimberly S Kenton  Catherine S Bradley  Julia R Fielding  Geoffrey W Cundiff  Caryl G Salomon  Christiane Hakim  Wen Ye  Holly E Richter
Institution:(1) Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA;(2) Department of Radiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA;(3) Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Urology, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, IL, USA;(4) Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, IA, USA;(5) Department of Radiology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA;(6) Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada;(7) Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Edward V. Hines, Jr. Veterans’ Administration Hospital, Hines, IL, USA;(8) Department of Radiology, Magee Women’s Hospital, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA;(9) Department of Biostatistics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA;(10) Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA;(11) Johns Hopkins Bayview Medical Center, 4940 Eastern Avenue, Baltimore, MD 21224, USA
Abstract:To compare pelvic anatomy, using magnetic resonance imaging, between postpartum women with or without pelvic floor disorders. We measured postpartum bony and soft tissue pelvic dimensions in 246 primiparas, 6–12-months postpartum. Anatomy was compared between women with and without urinary or fecal incontinence, or pelvic organ prolapse; P < 0.01 was considered statistically significant. A deeper sacral hollow was significantly associated with fecal incontinence (P = 0.005). Urinary incontinence was marginally associated with a wider intertuberous diameter (P = 0.017) and pelvic arch (P = 0.017). There were no significant differences in pelvimetry measures between women with and without prolapse (e.g., vaginal or cervical descent to or beyond the hymen). We did not detect meaningful differences in soft tissue dimensions for women with and without these pelvic floor disorders. Dimensions of the bony pelvis do not differ substantially between primiparous women with and without postpartum urinary incontinence, fecal incontinence and prolapse.
Keywords:Anal sphincter laceration  Fecal incontinence  Magnetic resonance imaging  Pelvimetry  Pelvic organ prolapse  Urinary incontinence
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号