首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        


Randomized controlled trial comparing immediate loading with conventional loading using cone-anchored implant-supported screw-retained removable prostheses: A 2-year follow-up clinical trial
Authors:Lauren Bernard  Marjolein Vercruyssen  Julie Vanderveken  Wim Coucke  Marc Quirynen  Ignace Naert
Institution:1. Assistant, Department of Oral Health Sciences, KU Leuven and Dentistry, Periodontology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium;2. Postdoctoral researcher, Department of Oral Health Sciences, KU Leuven and Dentistry, Periodontology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium;3. Assistant, Department of Oral Health Sciences, KU Leuven and Dentistry, Prosthetic Dentistry, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium;4. Consultant, Scientific Institute of Public Health, Brussels, Belgium;5. Professor and Chief, Department of Oral Health Sciences, KU Leuven and Dentistry, Periodontology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium;6. Professor-emeritus, Department of Oral Health Sciences, KU Leuven and Dentistry, Prosthetic Dentistry, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
Abstract:

Statement of problem

Implant-based prosthetic solutions can be time consuming. If implants can be loaded immediately, treatment time can be reduced.

Purpose

The purpose of this prospective randomized controlled trial was to monitor the survival rate of Ankylos implants, comparing conventional with immediate loading by using abutments with the SynCone concept for screw-retained removable prostheses in the edentulous maxilla.

Material and methods

A total of 90 implants were placed in 15 study participants. The participants were randomly assigned to the immediate or conventional loading treatment group. Radiographic and clinical parameters were recorded at the time of permanent prosthesis installment and at 1- and 2-year follow-up examinations, and participants’ satisfaction was measured by using questionnaires before and after prosthesis installation. A linear mixed model was used to measure differences.

Results

One implant in the conventional group was lost during abutment placement; hence, 89 implants could be followed for 2 years. Approximately 90% of these implants showed no bone loss or even bone gain at 1 and 2 years follow-up. Mean values for the immediate group were, respectively, 0.09 ±0.35 mm and 0.13 ±0.38 mm and 0.01 ±0.41 mm and ?0.06 ±0.32 mm for the conventional method. No significant differences (P=.053) were found in bone level alterations between the groups. For all participants, the mean number of surfaces (4 per implant) with bleeding on probing (BoP) and plaque were 0.76 ±0.81 and 0.16 ±0.42 at 1 year follow-up and 0.44 ±0.66 and 0.02 ±0.15, respectively, at the second-year follow-up. The mean pocket probing depths were 2.05 ±0.54 mm at 1 year and 2.18 ±0.64 mm at 2 years. For both groups, a significant rise in satisfaction and quality of life was observed (P≤.001) at 1 and 2 years compared with pretreatment.

Conclusions

Ankylos implants placed in the edentulous maxilla, immediately or conventionally loaded by a detachable prosthesis, showed favorable bone-level preservation after 2 years of follow-up. No significant differences could be found between the immediate and conventional groups. A significant increase in quality of life was observed for both loading modes.
Keywords:Corresponding author: Dr Lauren Bernard  Catholic University Leuven  UZ St  Raphael  Department of Periodontology  Kapucijnenvoer 33  B-3000 Leuven  BELGIUM
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号