Randomized controlled trial comparing immediate loading with conventional loading using cone-anchored implant-supported screw-retained removable prostheses: A 2-year follow-up clinical trial |
| |
Authors: | Lauren Bernard Marjolein Vercruyssen Julie Vanderveken Wim Coucke Marc Quirynen Ignace Naert |
| |
Institution: | 1. Assistant, Department of Oral Health Sciences, KU Leuven and Dentistry, Periodontology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium;2. Postdoctoral researcher, Department of Oral Health Sciences, KU Leuven and Dentistry, Periodontology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium;3. Assistant, Department of Oral Health Sciences, KU Leuven and Dentistry, Prosthetic Dentistry, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium;4. Consultant, Scientific Institute of Public Health, Brussels, Belgium;5. Professor and Chief, Department of Oral Health Sciences, KU Leuven and Dentistry, Periodontology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium;6. Professor-emeritus, Department of Oral Health Sciences, KU Leuven and Dentistry, Prosthetic Dentistry, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium |
| |
Abstract: | Statement of problemImplant-based prosthetic solutions can be time consuming. If implants can be loaded immediately, treatment time can be reduced.PurposeThe purpose of this prospective randomized controlled trial was to monitor the survival rate of Ankylos implants, comparing conventional with immediate loading by using abutments with the SynCone concept for screw-retained removable prostheses in the edentulous maxilla.Material and methodsA total of 90 implants were placed in 15 study participants. The participants were randomly assigned to the immediate or conventional loading treatment group. Radiographic and clinical parameters were recorded at the time of permanent prosthesis installment and at 1- and 2-year follow-up examinations, and participants’ satisfaction was measured by using questionnaires before and after prosthesis installation. A linear mixed model was used to measure differences.ResultsOne implant in the conventional group was lost during abutment placement; hence, 89 implants could be followed for 2 years. Approximately 90% of these implants showed no bone loss or even bone gain at 1 and 2 years follow-up. Mean values for the immediate group were, respectively, 0.09 ±0.35 mm and 0.13 ±0.38 mm and 0.01 ±0.41 mm and ?0.06 ±0.32 mm for the conventional method. No significant differences (P=.053) were found in bone level alterations between the groups. For all participants, the mean number of surfaces (4 per implant) with bleeding on probing (BoP) and plaque were 0.76 ±0.81 and 0.16 ±0.42 at 1 year follow-up and 0.44 ±0.66 and 0.02 ±0.15, respectively, at the second-year follow-up. The mean pocket probing depths were 2.05 ±0.54 mm at 1 year and 2.18 ±0.64 mm at 2 years. For both groups, a significant rise in satisfaction and quality of life was observed (P≤.001) at 1 and 2 years compared with pretreatment.ConclusionsAnkylos implants placed in the edentulous maxilla, immediately or conventionally loaded by a detachable prosthesis, showed favorable bone-level preservation after 2 years of follow-up. No significant differences could be found between the immediate and conventional groups. A significant increase in quality of life was observed for both loading modes. |
| |
Keywords: | Corresponding author: Dr Lauren Bernard Catholic University Leuven UZ St Raphael Department of Periodontology Kapucijnenvoer 33 B-3000 Leuven BELGIUM |
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录! |
|