Diagnosis of primary hemifacial spasm |
| |
Authors: | J.-P. Lefaucheur N. Ben Daamer S. Sangla C. Le Guerinel |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. Unité de neurophysiologie clinique, service de physiologie, explorations fonctionnelles, hôpital Henri-Mondor, AP–HP, 94010 Créteil, France;2. EA 4391, faculté de médecine, université Paris-Est Créteil, 84010 Créteil, France;3. Service de neuroradiologie, hôpital Henri-Mondor, AP–HP, 94010 Créteil, France;4. Service de neurologie, fondation ophtalmologique Adolphe-de-Rothschild, 75019 Paris, France;5. Service de neurochirurgie, fondation ophtalmologique Adolphe-de-Rothschild, 75019 Paris, France |
| |
Abstract: | The diagnosis of primary hemifacial spasm (pHFS), due to a benign compression of the facial motor nerve by a vessel, within or close to its root exit zone, is often made with delay. Misdiagnosis includes psychogenic spasm, tics, facial myokymia or blepharospasm, but in fact post-facial palsy synkinesis (post-paralytic HFS) is the closest clinical condition, because it is limited to the territory of the facial nerve of a single hemiface. The differential diagnosis between these two entities, whose pathophysiological mechanisms are very different, can be made by electroneuromyographic (ENMG) examination. In addition, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is essential to show the offending vessel at the origin of pHFS and the absence of other causes of nerve compression. However, the diagnosis cannot be made on MRI basis alone, since a neurovascular conflict can be present in clinically asymptomatic subjects. This article reviews the clinical, MRI, and ENMG features in favour of a pHFS diagnosis as well as the various differential diagnoses of this involuntary facial movement disorder. |
| |
Keywords: | Differential diagnosis Electromyography Facial nerve Hemifacial spasm Magnetic resonance imaging Movement disorders Neurovascular conflict |
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录! |
|