首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        

症状性颈动脉狭窄患者介入和药物治疗效果的短期随访
引用本文:王继恒,赵雄飞.症状性颈动脉狭窄患者介入和药物治疗效果的短期随访[J].吉林医学,2010,31(32):5707-5708.
作者姓名:王继恒  赵雄飞
作者单位:王继恒 (中铁二十局中心医院,陕西,咸阳,712000) ; 赵雄飞 (中铁二十局中心医院,陕西,咸阳,712000) ;
摘    要:目的:研究症状性颈动脉狭窄(>75%)患者的预后,前瞻性评价介入治疗和药物治疗的效果。方法:51例脑卒中或TIA合并颈动脉狭窄患者意向性分组,分为介入组和药物治疗组。前者20例择期给予颈动脉支架置入术,后者31例给予抗血小板药物及他汀类药物的治疗。随访2年,观察其功能预后(mRS)及脑卒中事件的发生率。结果:两组患者的基线资料(性别、年龄、病史、血压、血脂、NIHSS、mRS)差异无统计学意义。在随访90d,1年,2年时,介入组mRs均低于药物治疗组,且差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05);而1年和2年时脑卒中或TIA的发生率差异存在统计学意义,发病1年时,介入组血管事件5例(5/20),药物治疗组21例(21/31),差异具有统计学意义(χ2=10.53,P=0.01)。在发病2年时,介入组血管事件3例(3/20),药物治疗组19例(19/31),差异具有统计学意义(χ2=9.65,P=0.002)。结论:对于症状性颈动脉狭窄患者,介入治疗较单纯的药物治疗能获得较好的功能预后;介入治疗能减少脑卒中或TIA发病后2年内的发生。

关 键 词:颈动脉狭窄  支架置入  随访研究

Short-term effects of interventional therapy vs drug on symptomatic carotid artery stenosis
WANG Ji-heng,ZHAO Xiong-fei.Short-term effects of interventional therapy vs drug on symptomatic carotid artery stenosis[J].Jilin Medical Journal,2010,31(32):5707-5708.
Authors:WANG Ji-heng  ZHAO Xiong-fei
Institution:(Department of Cerebrovascular Disease,China Railway 20 Bureau Center Hospital,Xianyang 712000,China)
Abstract:Objective To identify and evaluate the effect of different therapy(interventional therapy ang drug)on symptomatic carotid artery stenosis(75%)prospectively.Method Fifty-one patients with stroke or transient ischemic attack(TIA)suffering from symptomatic carotid artery stenosis were included into this study consectively.They were given intra-artery intervention or united drug therapy.Twenty patients were transplanted with stent,thirty-one patients were given united drug therapy such as antiplatelet,statins drug.The major outcome was the 2-year functional prognosis evaluated by modified Rankin score(mRS)and the cardiovascular events in 1 year,2 years.Results There were no statistical significance of sex,age,medical history,blood pressure,total cholesterol,triglycerde in the two groups at baseline.The modified Rankin score(mRS)of patients who were given intra-artery intervention therapy was lower than the one who were given united drug therapy in 90 d,1 year and 2 years.The incidence of cardiovascular events in 1 year and 2 years after the index stroke or TIA was lower in the intra-artery intervention group than in the united drug therapy(For 1 year's follow up,intervention group∶united drug therapy group=5/20∶21/31,χ2=10.53,P=0.01;For 2 years' follow up,3/20∶19/31,χ2=9.65,P=0.002).Conclusion For the stroke or TIA patients suffering from carotid artery stenosis(75%),intra-artery intervention is superior to pure united drug therapy in achieving better therapeutical effect and reducing the incidence of cardiovascular events after index stroke or TIA.
Keywords:Carotid stenosis  Stent implantation  Follow-up study
本文献已被 维普 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号