首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        


Pentosan polysulfate sodium therapy for men with chronic pelvic pain syndrome: a multicenter, randomized, placebo controlled study
Authors:Nickel J Curtis  Forrest John B  Tomera Kevin  Hernandez-Graulau Jose  Moon Timothy D  Schaeffer Anthony J  Krieger John N  Zeitlin Scott I  Evans Robert J  Lama Daniel J  Neal Durwood E  Sant Grannum R
Institution:aFrom the Department of Urology, Queens University (JCN), Kingston, Ontario, Canada, Urologic Specialists of Oklahoma, Inc. (JBF), Tulsa, Oklahoma, Alaska Clinical Research Center (KT), Anchorage, Alaska, University of Illinois School of Medicine at Peoria (JH-G), Peoria, Illinois, University of Wisconsin and Veterans Affairs Medical Center (TDM), Madison, Wisconsin, Department of Urology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University (AJS), Chicago, Illinois, Department of Urology, University of Washington School of Medicine (JNK), Seattle, Washington, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California (SIZ), Los Angeles and San Bernardino Urological Associates (DJL), San Bernardino, California, Urology Center (RJE), Greensboro, North Carolina, University of Missouri (DEN), Columbia, Missouri, and Department of Urology, Tufts University School of Medicine (GRS), Boston, Massachusetts
Abstract:Purpose:We evaluated the efficacy and tolerability of pentosan polysulfate sodium (PPS) for the treatment of men with chronic pelvic pain syndrome (CPPS), National Institutes of Health (NIH) category III.Materials and Methods:In a 16-week double-blind study 100 men with a clinical diagnosis of CPPS were randomized to receive 300 mg PPS or placebo 3 times daily. Clinical Global Improvement (CGI) was the primary outcome measure. Additional outcome measures were the NIH-Chronic Prostatitis Symptom Index (CPSI), Subjective Global Assessment and Symptom Severity Index assessment tools.Results:Significantly more patients receiving PPS experienced moderate to marked improvement based on CGI assessment (18 or 37% vs 8 or 18%, p = 0.04). However, mean CGI scores were not significantly different between the PPS group (1.0) and placebo groups (1.0 vs 0.6, p = 0.107). All NIH-CPSI domains suggested a positive effect for PPS and for total NIH-CPSI the difference approached statistical significance (−5.9 or 22% vs −3.2 or 12%, p = 0.068). The PPS group showed significantly greater improvement in NIH-CPSI quality of life domain scores than the placebo group (−2.0 or 22% vs −1.0 or 12%, p = 0.031). Of patients receiving PPS 67% and 80% of those receiving placebo completed the 16-week study. Diarrhea, nausea and headache were the most common adverse events.Conclusions:Pentosan polysulfate (900 mg daily) was more likely than placebo to provide relief for CPPS symptoms.
Keywords:Key Words:: prostate  prostatitis  pelvic pain  pentosan sulfuric polyester
本文献已被 ScienceDirect PubMed 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号