首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        

抗血管生成药物治疗晚期肾癌疗效的Meta分析
引用本文:庄乾元,刘飞,陈先国,彭鄂军,李有元,齐永,杜立环.抗血管生成药物治疗晚期肾癌疗效的Meta分析[J].中国循证医学杂志,2010,10(6):688-692.
作者姓名:庄乾元  刘飞  陈先国  彭鄂军  李有元  齐永  杜立环
作者单位:华中科技大学同济医学院附属同济医院泌尿外科,武汉,430030
摘    要:目的系统评价干扰素和靶向血管内皮生长因子(VEGF)抗血管生成药物(索拉非尼、舒尼替尼和贝伐单抗)治疗晚期肾癌的疗效。方法计算机检索MEDLINE、EMbase、中国生物医学期刊文献数据库、中文科技期刊数据库,收集1979~2009年国内外公开发表的抗血管生成药物与干扰素比较的随机对照试验。按Cochrane系统评价方法评价纳入研究质量和提取有效数据,并用RevMan4.2软件进行Meta分析。结果最终纳入4个随机对照试验,共2320例。Meta分析结果显示:①与干扰素相比,血管生成抑制剂单用能有效抑制晚期肾癌进展OR=0.38,95%CI(0.29,0.51),P〈0.01]和控制晚期肾癌OR=2.53,95%CI(1.87,3.43),P〈0.01],但两者对治疗肾癌的总有效率差异无统计学意义OR=1.97,95%CI(0.20,19.57),P=0.56];②与单用干扰素相比,血管生成抑制剂联合干扰素能有效抑制晚期肾癌进展OR=0.67,95%CI(0.53,0.84),P=0.0005]和控制晚期肾癌OR=2.14,95%CI(1.65,2.78),P〈0.01],显著提高晚期肾癌治疗的总有效率OR=2.65,95%CI(1.94,3.61),P〈0.01];③血管生成抑制剂与干扰素各自单用治疗发生严重不良事件的可能性相当OR=1.98,95%CI(0.90,4.34),P=0.09],但二者联用更易发生严重不良事件OR=2.63,95%CI(2.09,3.31),P〈0.01]。结论与干扰素相比,血管生成抑制剂单用能更有效抑制肿瘤进展,控制晚期肾癌;血管生成抑制剂与干扰素联用能显著提高肿瘤治疗总有效率,但也伴随着更多药物相关严重不良事件的发生。

关 键 词:肾细胞癌  靶向治疗  血管内皮生长因子  干扰素  Meta分析

Meta-analysis of Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Agents Therapy for Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma
ZHUANG Qian-yuan,LIU Fei,CHEN Xian-guo,PENG E-jun,LI You-yuan,QI Yong,DU Li-huan.Meta-analysis of Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Agents Therapy for Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma[J].Chinese Journal of Evidence-based Medicine,2010,10(6):688-692.
Authors:ZHUANG Qian-yuan  LIU Fei  CHEN Xian-guo  PENG E-jun  LI You-yuan  QI Yong  DU Li-huan
Institution:(Department of Urology,Tongji Hospital,Tongji Medical College,Huazhong University of Science and Technology,Wuhan 430030,China )
Abstract:Objective To evaluate the efficacy and safety of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor(VEGF) agents for advanced renal cell carcinoma.Methods We searched MEDLINE,EMbase,The Cochrane Library,CBMdisc and China Academic Periodical database from the establishment of each database to April 2009.We included randomized controlled trials(RCTs) that evaluated anti-VEGF agents(sunitinib,sorafenib and bevacizumab).The quality of the included trials was evaluated by two reviewers independently.Meta-analyses were conducted by the Cochrane Collaboration's RevMan 4.2 software.Results Four RCTs involving 2 320 patients were identified.According to the different interventions for advanced renal cell carcinoma,we divided the patients into two groups:anti-VEGF agents monotherapy and anti-VEGF agents plus interferon combination treatment.Our meta-analyses showed:monotherapy was superior to interferon on inhibition of tumor progression OR=0.38,95%CI(0.29,0.51),P〈0.01] and control of tumor OR=2.53,95%CI(1.87,3.43),P〈0.01],but was not significantly different from interferon on the overall effective rate OR=1.97,95%CI(0.20,19.57),P=0.56] and serious side effects OR=1.98,95%CI(0.90,4.34),P=0.09].There were significant differences between anti-VEGF agents plus interferon and interferon alone on inhibition of tumor progression OR=0.67,95%CI(0.53,0.84),P=0.000 5],overall effective rate OR=2.65,95%CI(1.94,3.61),P〈0.01],control of tumor OR=2.14,95%CI(1.65,2.78),P〈0.01] and serious side effects OR=2.63,95%CI(2.09,3.31),P〈0.01].Conclusion Compared with interferon,anti-VEGF agents could inhibit tumor progression more effectively.Moreover,the combination therapy with interferon could offer a more favorable overall effective rate for advanced renal cell carcinoma,but then followed by more serious side effects.We need to weigh the merits and demerits of drugs before making a clinical decision for advanced renal cell carcinoma.
Keywords:Renal cell carcinoma  Target therapy  Vascular endothelial growth factor  Interferon  Meta-analysis
本文献已被 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号