首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        

五种检查仪器对角膜水平直径测量的对比分析
引用本文:张小兰,龚芮,王顺清,黄永志.五种检查仪器对角膜水平直径测量的对比分析[J].国际眼科杂志,2019,19(4):704-708.
作者姓名:张小兰  龚芮  王顺清  黄永志
作者单位:中国四川省成都市,四川大学华西医院眼科,中国四川省成都市,四川大学华西医院眼科,中国四川省成都市,四川大学华西医院眼科,中国四川省成都市,四川大学华西医院眼科
摘    要:

目的:分析五种角膜直径测量方法对角膜水平直径测量的相关性和一致性。

方法:纳入2018-02/03在四川大学华西医院眼科行双眼ICL植入的患者25例50眼,术前分别采用规尺、眼前节分析系统SIRIUS、IOL Master500、眼前节OCT和UBM 5种方法测量角膜水平直径,比较5种方法测量结果的相关性及一致性。

结果:规尺、眼前节分析系统SIRIUS、IOL Master500、眼前节OCT和UBM测量的角膜水平直径分别为11.54±0.30、11.77±0.33、11.98±0.33、11.63±0.35、11.53±0.34mm(P<0.05),q检验结果显示规尺法与UBM法、眼前节OCT法,UBM法与眼前节OCT法测量的WTW值之间均无差异(P>0.05),直线相关分析发现五种检查方法测量值之间均具有显著相关性,Bland-Altman分析发现,规尺与SIRIUS、UBM、眼前节OCT检查值的95%LoA上下限绝对值均≤0.50mm。

结论:五种测量角膜水平直径的结果,规尺与SIRIUS,UBM和前节OCT的结果可以互换,其他结果不能互换。IOL Master500测量值最大,不宜作为测量角膜水平直径大小的诊断依据,其他测量设备检查结果应结合临床实践。

关 键 词:角膜水平直径    规尺    SIRIUS眼前节分析系统    IOL  Master500    眼前节OCT    超声生物显微镜    一致性分析
收稿时间:2018/12/4 0:00:00
修稿时间:2019/3/11 0:00:00

Contrastive analysis of corneal horizontal diameter measurement by five instruments
Xiao-Lan Zhang,Rui Gong,Shun-Qing Wang and Yong-Zhi Huang.Contrastive analysis of corneal horizontal diameter measurement by five instruments[J].International Journal of Ophthalmology,2019,19(4):704-708.
Authors:Xiao-Lan Zhang  Rui Gong  Shun-Qing Wang and Yong-Zhi Huang
Institution:Department of Ophthalmology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan Province, China,Department of Ophthalmology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan Province, China,Department of Ophthalmology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan Province, China and Department of Ophthalmology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan Province, China
Abstract:AIM: To analyze the correlation and consistency of five corneal diameter measurements.

METHODS: Totally 25 cases(50 eyes)who underwent ICL implantation in West China Hospital. The preoperative horizontal corneal diameter was measured using measuring caliper, SIRIUS anterior eye assay system, IOL Master500, anterior segment OCT and UBM.

RESULTS: The mean WTW distances were 11.54±0.30 mm as obtained with measuring caliper, 11.77±0.33mm with SIRIUS anterior eye assay system, 11.98±0.33mm with IOL Master500, 11.63±0.35mm with anterior segment OCT and 11.53±0.34mm with UBM. No statistical difference was found between measuring caliper and UBM, measuring caliper and anterior segment OCT, UBM and anterior segment OCT. The linear correlation analysis found significant correlation between the measurements of the five measurements. The Bland-Altman analysis for the measuring caliper and SIRIUS, measuring caliper and UBM, measuring caliper and anterior segment OCT found that the absolute values of 95% LOA upper and lower limits were less than 0.5mm.

CONCLUSION: The results of the four kinds of corneal horizontal diameter measurements can be interchanged including SIRIUS, UBM, anterior segment OCT and measuring caliper. IOL Master500 results are the largest, that cannot be used as a diagnostic basis for measuring the size of corneal horizontal diameter. The results of other measurement equipment should be combined with clinical practice.

Keywords:corneal diameter  caliper  SIRIUS anterior eye assay system  IOL Master500  anterior segment OCT  UBM  consistency analysis
点击此处可从《国际眼科杂志》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《国际眼科杂志》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号