首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        

乳腺癌保乳术后调强放疗摆位误差相关因素分析
引用本文:徐晓,张敏娜,王冰,吴侃,王佳浩,徐丽霞,李夏东,刘坚,夏冰.乳腺癌保乳术后调强放疗摆位误差相关因素分析[J].中华放射医学与防护杂志,2019,39(6):434-438.
作者姓名:徐晓  张敏娜  王冰  吴侃  王佳浩  徐丽霞  李夏东  刘坚  夏冰
作者单位:杭州市肿瘤医院放疗科 310002,杭州市肿瘤医院放疗科 310002,杭州市肿瘤医院放疗科 310002,杭州市肿瘤医院放疗科 310002,杭州市肿瘤医院放疗科 310002,杭州市肿瘤医院放疗科 310002,杭州市肿瘤医院放疗科 310002,浙江大学医学院附属杭州市第一人民医院乳腺外科 310006,杭州市肿瘤医院放疗科 310002
摘    要:目的 分析热塑体膜和乳腺托架两种固定方式用于乳腺癌保乳术后调强放射治疗的摆位误差,以及相关临床因素对其的影响。方法 回顾性分析2016年1月至2018年6月接受调强放射治疗的乳腺癌保乳术后患者的临床资料,共纳入34例,18例采用热塑体膜固定,16例采用乳腺托架固定。利用锥形束CT比较两组摆位误差的分布,计算群体系统误差和随机误差,并分析临床因素对摆位误差的影响。结果 两组患者的摆位误差总体以热塑体膜组为优,但仅在TyRy两个维度上差异有统计学意义(t=2.385、2.427,P<0.05)。依据系统和随机误差计算PTV外放边界,热塑体膜组在TxTyTz方向分别为2.65、4.36、2.87 mm,乳腺托架组分别为5.71、6.07、4.20 mm。多因素分析发现,BMI是影响Ry摆位误差的潜在因素(t=-2.785,P<0.05)。结论 乳腺癌保乳术后接受放疗的患者,采用热塑体膜固定可以有效减少摆位误差,缩小PTV外扩边界,这一点在高BMI的患者中表现的更为明显。

关 键 词:乳腺癌  放射治疗  热塑体膜  摆位误差
收稿时间:2018/12/4 0:00:00

Factors associated with set-up errors in intensity-modulated radiotherapy after breast conserving surgery
Xu Xiao,Zhang Minn,Wang Bin,Wu Kan,Wang Jiahao,Xu Lixi,Li Xiadong,Liu Jian and Xia Bing.Factors associated with set-up errors in intensity-modulated radiotherapy after breast conserving surgery[J].Chinese Journal of Radiological Medicine and Protection,2019,39(6):434-438.
Authors:Xu Xiao  Zhang Minn  Wang Bin  Wu Kan  Wang Jiahao  Xu Lixi  Li Xiadong  Liu Jian and Xia Bing
Institution:Department of Radiation Oncology, Hangzhou Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou 310002, China,Department of Radiation Oncology, Hangzhou Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou 310002, China,Department of Radiation Oncology, Hangzhou Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou 310002, China,Department of Radiation Oncology, Hangzhou Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou 310002, China,Department of Radiation Oncology, Hangzhou Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou 310002, China,Department of Radiation Oncology, Hangzhou Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou 310002, China,Department of Radiation Oncology, Hangzhou Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou 310002, China,Department of Breast Surgery, Affiliated Hangzhou First People''s Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou 310006, China and Department of Radiation Oncology, Hangzhou Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou 310002, China
Abstract:Objective To evaluate the difference of set-up errors between thermoplastic mask and breast bracket in patients receiving intensity-modulated radiotherapy after breast conserving surgery, and the impact of clinical factors associated with set-up errors. Methods A total of 34 patients treated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy after breast conserving surgery from January 2016 to June 2018 were reviewed. Eighteen patients were fixed with thermoplastic mask, and sixteen were with breast bracket. Weekly CBCT scan records were used to analyze set-up errors, and group systematic and random errors were computed. The influence of clinical factors on set-up errors was also analyzed. Results The immobilization technique with thermoplastic mask showed great superior in comparison with breast bracket; however, only in the Ty (translation) and Ry (rotation), the differences had significance. Based on group systematic and random errors, PTV margins in Tx, Ty and Tz were 2.65, 4.36 and 2.87 mm in thermoplastic mask group, as well as 5.71, 6.07 and 4.20 mm in breast bracket group, respectively. Multi-factor regression analysis showed that BMI was independent factors affecting set-up errors. Conclusions Compared with breast bracket, the immobilization technique with thermoplastic mask has the potential of reducing set-up errors and PTV margins in patients receiving intensity-modulated radiotherapy after breast conserving surgery, especially in patients with high BMI.
Keywords:Breast cancer  Radiotherapy  Thermoplastic mask  Set-up error
点击此处可从《中华放射医学与防护杂志》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《中华放射医学与防护杂志》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号