首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

CareDose 4D联合Care kV对CT肺部磨玻璃密度结节图像质量影响的体模研究
引用本文:胡仕北,周鹏,何长久,青浩渺,张涛,彭育标,李德珊. CareDose 4D联合Care kV对CT肺部磨玻璃密度结节图像质量影响的体模研究[J]. 中华放射医学与防护杂志, 2019, 39(7): 534-538
作者姓名:胡仕北  周鹏  何长久  青浩渺  张涛  彭育标  李德珊
作者单位:四川省肿瘤医院·研究所 四川省癌症防治中心 电子科技大学医学院放射科, 成都 610041,四川省肿瘤医院·研究所 四川省癌症防治中心 电子科技大学医学院放射科, 成都 610041,四川省肿瘤医院·研究所 四川省癌症防治中心 电子科技大学医学院放射科, 成都 610041,四川省肿瘤医院·研究所 四川省癌症防治中心 电子科技大学医学院放射科, 成都 610041,四川省肿瘤医院·研究所 四川省癌症防治中心 电子科技大学医学院放射科, 成都 610041,四川省肿瘤医院·研究所 四川省癌症防治中心 电子科技大学医学院放射科, 成都 610041,四川省肿瘤医院·研究所 四川省癌症防治中心 电子科技大学医学院放射科, 成都 610041
基金项目:四川省科技计划项目(2017JY0080,2018SZ0183)
摘    要:目的 探讨CareDose 4D联合Care kV对CT肺部磨玻璃密度结节(ground glass nodule,GGN)图像质量和辐射剂量的影响。方法 采用7种低剂量方案对含有6个GGN的胸部仿真体模行CT扫描。方案1采用CareDose 4D+Care kV。方案2、3、4管电压120 kV,管电流分别为30、20、10 mAs。方案5、6、7管电压100 kV,管电流分别为30、20、10 mAs。比较不同方案的图像质量[CT值、对比噪声比(CNR)、噪声值(SD)和主观评分]和有效剂量(E)。结果 各方案GGN的CT值差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。方案1的SD高于方案2、3、5,低于方案7,而CNR低于方案2、3、5,高于方案7,差异均有统计学意义(t=13.020、9.560、8.120、-5.720、-7.849、-5.192、-4.130、1.361,P<0.05)。方案1的SD、CNR与方案4、6差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。方案1、2、3、5、6各GGN的主观评分均≥ 3分,方案4、7各有1个GGN的主观评分<3分。方案1的E较方案2、3、5、6分别降低了63.0%、44.4%、38.8%、9.1%。结论 CareDose 4D联合Care kV在低剂量肺部CT扫描中,可保证GGN的图像质量,有效降低辐射剂量。

关 键 词:CareDose 4D  Care kV  磨玻璃密度结节  辐射剂量  图像质量
收稿时间:2019-01-23

Phantom study of the influence of CareDose 4D and Care kV on CT pulmonary ground glass nodule with respect to image quality and radiation dose
Hu Shibei,Zhou Peng,He Changjiu,Qing Haomiao,Zhang Tao,Peng Yubiao and Li Deshan. Phantom study of the influence of CareDose 4D and Care kV on CT pulmonary ground glass nodule with respect to image quality and radiation dose[J]. Chinese Journal of Radiological Medicine and Protection, 2019, 39(7): 534-538
Authors:Hu Shibei  Zhou Peng  He Changjiu  Qing Haomiao  Zhang Tao  Peng Yubiao  Li Deshan
Affiliation:Department of Radiology, Sichuan Cancer Hospital & Institute, Sichuan Cancer Center, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology, Chengdu 610041, China,Department of Radiology, Sichuan Cancer Hospital & Institute, Sichuan Cancer Center, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology, Chengdu 610041, China,Department of Radiology, Sichuan Cancer Hospital & Institute, Sichuan Cancer Center, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology, Chengdu 610041, China,Department of Radiology, Sichuan Cancer Hospital & Institute, Sichuan Cancer Center, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology, Chengdu 610041, China,Department of Radiology, Sichuan Cancer Hospital & Institute, Sichuan Cancer Center, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology, Chengdu 610041, China,Department of Radiology, Sichuan Cancer Hospital & Institute, Sichuan Cancer Center, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology, Chengdu 610041, China and Department of Radiology, Sichuan Cancer Hospital & Institute, Sichuan Cancer Center, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology, Chengdu 610041, China
Abstract:Objective To investigate the effect of CareDose 4D combined with Care kV on CT pulmonary ground glass nodule (GGN) with respect to quality and radiation dose. Methods The thoracic model containing 6 GGN was performed by using 7 low-dose schemes. The CareDose 4D + Care kV was adopted in scheme 1. In schemes 2, 3 and 4, the tube voltage was 120 kV, and the tube current 30, 20 and 10 mAs respectively. In schemes 5, 6 and 7, the tube voltage was 100 kV, and the tube current was 30, 20 and 10 mAs, respectively. The image quality[CT value, contrast noise ratio (CNR), noise value (SD) and subjective score] and effective dose (E) were compared. Results There was no statistically significant difference in CT value of GGN among different schemes (P>0.05). The SD of scheme 1 was higher than those of schemes 2, 3 and 5, but lower than those f scheme 7, while the CNR of scheme 1 was lower than those of schemes 2, 3 and 5, but higher than that of scheme 7 (t=13.020, 9.560, 8.120, -5.720, -7.849, -5.192, -4.130, 1.361,P<0.05). SD and CNR of scheme 1 were not significantly different from those of scheme 4 and 6 (P>0.05). The subjective scores of each GGN of schemes 1, 2, 3, 5 and 6 was over 3 points, but and the subjective scores of one GGN of each of schemes 4 and 7 were below 3 points. The value E of the scheme 1 was reduced by 63.0%, 44.4%, 38.8%, and 9.1%, compared with the schemes 2, 3, 5 and 6, respectively. Conclusions CareDose 4D combined with Care kV in low-dose lung CT scan can ensure the image quality of GGN and reduce the radiation dose effectively.
Keywords:CareDose 4D  Care kV  Ground glass nodule  Radiation dose  Image quality
点击此处可从《中华放射医学与防护杂志》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《中华放射医学与防护杂志》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号