首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


Comparison of advanced adenocarcinomas of esophagogastric junction and distal stomach in Japanese patients
Authors:Akiko Kawano  Takako Eguchi Nakajima  Ichiro Oda  Nobukazu Hokamura  Satoru Iwasa  Ken Kato  Tetsuya Hamaguchi  Yasuhide Yamada  Hirofumi Fujii  Yasuhiro Shimada
Affiliation:1. Gastrointestinal Oncology Division, National Cancer Center Hospital, 5-1-1 Tsukiji, Chuou-ku, Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan
5. Clinical Oncology Division, Jichi Medical University Hospital, 3311-1 Yakushiji, Shimotsuke, Tochigi, 329-0498, Japan
6. 6-5-1 Kashiwanoha, Kashiwa, Chiba, 277-8577, Japan
2. Department of Clinical Oncology, St. Marianna University, School of Medicine, 2-16-1 Sugao, Miyamae-ku, Kawasaki, Kanagawa, 216-8511, Japan
3. Endoscopy Division, National Cancer Center Hospital, 5-1-1 Tsukiji, Chuou-ku, Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan
4. Esophageal Surgery Division, National Cancer Center Hospital, 5-1-1 Tsukiji, Chuou-ku, Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan
Abstract:

Background

There have been no reports on the incidence, characteristics, treatment outcomes, and prognosis of inoperably advanced or recurrent adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction (AEGJ) in Japan.

Methods

We investigated the clinicopathological characteristics, treatment outcomes, and prognosis for 816 patients with esophagogastric junctional and gastric adenocarcinoma who received first-line chemotherapy between 2004 and 2009.

Results

Of 816 patients, 82 (10 %) had AEGJ. The patients with AEGJ had significantly more lung and lymph node metastasis, but less peritoneal metastasis, than those with gastric adenocarcinoma (GAC). The objective response rate to first-line chemotherapy was 23.3 % for patients with AEGJ and 22.6 % in patients with GAC (p = 0.90). The median survival was 13.0 months in AEGJ and 11.8 months in GAC (p = 0.445). In no patient was tumor site a significant prognostic factor (p = 0.472). In patients with AEGJ, ECOG PS ≥ 2, presence of liver metastasis, and absence of lung metastasis were significantly associated with poor prognosis.

Conclusions

No significant differences were observed in treatment outcomes between advanced AEGJ and GAC. Therefore, the same chemotherapy regimen can be given as a treatment arm in future Japanese clinical trials to both patients with inoperably advanced or recurrent AEGJ and those with GAC.
Keywords:
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号